Jose Rubin Statham vs Thomas Nicholas Gadecki — Sydney CH Qualifying Round 1

Sydney CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
NZL2
Jose Rubin Statham
39 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 October 2023
hard
AUS
Thomas Nicholas Gadecki
#2142ATP
20 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
L
Statham J.
6-4 6-3
Gadecki T.
Statham J.
662
Gadecki T.
430

Jose Rubin Statham defeated Thomas Nicholas Gadecki 6-4 6-3 in the Sydney CH qualifying round 1 on hard. The result followed the form book — Jose Rubin Statham came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Statham J.serving88% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Gadecki T.

Gadecki T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Statham J.

Serve advantage — Statham J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. Small sample — read as indicative. About

Statistics

This season
Statham J.Gadecki T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
57%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
71%
58%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
40%
Service points won·Clear edge
63%
50%
Return points won·Clear edge
34%
17%
Break points saved·Dominant
59%
20%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.8
3.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.9
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (71 vs 1). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Statham J.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Gadecki T.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
1.7
Surface form
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.1
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Q2
Dellavedova M.[11]
Romios M.
7-633-66-1
Statham J.[2]
Wehnelt K.[9]
6-47-62
Seggerman R.
Mott B.[1]
3-66-36-4
Moriya H.[8]
Ly N.[6]
6-736-36-3
Nam J.
Takahashi Y.[5]
6-36-1
Rai A.[3]
Ochi M.[10]
7-56-2
Q1
Moriya H.[8]
Court J.
6-33-66-4
Wehnelt K.[9]
Van Rensburg S.
6-16-2
Romios M.
Fancutt T.[4]
6-16-3
Takahashi Y.[5]
Yin B.
6-26-3
Statham J.[2]
Gadecki T.
6-46-3
Ly N.[6]
Hulme M.
6-46-3
Dellavedova M.[11]
Braithwaite T.
6-36-2
Ochi M.[10]
Bouzige M.
6-26-2
Rai A.[3]
Puttergill C.
6-12-66-3
Nam J.
Klintcharov A.
6-27-63
Seggerman R.
Pearson K.
6-47-64
Mott B.[1]
Inui Y.
7-56-786-2