Lukas Klein vs Nerman Fatic — Ismaning CH Round of 16

Ismaning CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Lukas Klein
SVK
Lukas Klein
#185ATP
1601ELO
1535Hard ELO
$64kYTD
$1.3MCAREER
28 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 30 October 2023
hard
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1417Hard ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
Klein L.
6-7 6-4 6-4
Fatic N.
Klein L.
60662
Fatic N.
77441

Lukas Klein defeated Nerman Fatic 6-7 6-4 6-4 in the Ismaning CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Lukas Klein came in ranked #185, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Klein L.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Fatic N.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Klein L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Klein L.Fatic N.
1st serve in·Even
66%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
65%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
63%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.4
4.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.1
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (186 vs 143). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Klein L.Fatic N.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
39
24
Break points saved·Dominant
92
63
Break points won·Dominant
1
36
Deciding sets·Dominant
63
24
Tiebreaks·Even
31
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Klein L.
7.9
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Fatic N.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
6.5+118 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.5Hard Elo 1417
6.3Overall Elo 1601
ELO gap
3.7Overall Elo 1496
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
9.4
Surface form
3.6
10.08-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
2.3
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Bellier A.
Marterer M.[2]
7-656-757-66
Semi-finals
Bellier A.
Molleker R.
7-656-2
Marterer M.[2]
Klein L.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Klein L.
Rehberg M.
6-36-2
Bellier A.
Huesler M.[8]
6-36-2
Marterer M.[2]
Paulson A.
6-26-4
Molleker R.
Kachmazov A.
7-56-776-3
R16
Molleker R.
Stricker D.[1]
6-724-1
Kachmazov A.
Bourgue M.
6-716-36-3
Huesler M.[8]
Squire H.
6-35-77-65
Marterer M.[2]
Zuk K.
6-37-63
Rehberg M.
Rosenkranz M.
7-656-4
Klein L.
Fatic N.
6-706-46-4
Bellier A.
Otte O.
6-47-63
Paulson A.
Stodder T.
7-696-3
R32
Bourgue M.
Krutykh O.
6-36-0
Kachmazov A.
Choinski J.[6]
6-45-76-2
Fatic N.
Copil M.
7-57-5
Otte O.
Topo M.
6-726-37-63
Marterer M.[2]
Geerts M.
6-36-4
Zuk K.
Andreev A.
7-6126-4
Paulson A.
Wessels L.
6-46-766-3
Stodder T.
Sachko V.[7]
3-67-636-3
Rosenkranz M.
Valkusz M.
6-47-613
Klein L.
Dzumhur D.[5]
6-33-66-1
Huesler M.[8]
Poljicak M.
6-46-1
Bellier A.
Mayot H.[9]
7-616-3
Molleker R.
Masur D.
7-644-66-3
Rehberg M.
Cressy M.[3]
6-756-47-64
Squire H.
Yevseyev D.
6-36-4
Stricker D.[1]
Sousa J.
7-643-66-3