Jack Draper vs Billy Harris — Bergamo CH Quarter-final

Bergamo CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Jack Draper
GBR1
Jack Draper
#145ATP
1822ELO
1783Hard ELO
$305kYTD
$8.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 October 2023
hard
Billy Harris
GBR
Billy Harris
#154ATP
1508ELO
1473Hard ELO
$236kYTD
$1.5MCAREER
31 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWWLWL
Draper J.
6-2 6-3
Harris B.
Draper J.
662
Harris B.
230

Jack Draper defeated Billy Harris 6-2 6-3 in the Bergamo CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Jack Draper came in ranked #145.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Draper J.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Harris B.

Harris B.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Draper J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Draper J.Harris B.
1st serve in·Even
61%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
67%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Even
64%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
8.1
5.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (156 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Draper J.Harris B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
88
46
Break points saved·Slight edge
99
91
Break points won·Dominant
83
10
Deciding sets·Clear edge
96
82
Tiebreaks·Dominant
95
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Draper J.
8.2
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Harris B.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
10.0+310 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.0Hard Elo 1473
10.0Overall Elo 1822
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1508
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.7
Surface form
7.8
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.7
Minutes 14d
1.5
7.0
3-set count
0.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Draper J.Harris B.
Freshness·Even
100
96

Draper J.: 18 days rest · Harris B.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Draper J.[1]
Goffin D.[5]
1-67-636-3
Semi-finals
Draper J.[1]
Nakashima B.
6-13-67-5
Goffin D.[5]
Lajal M.
6-746-36-4
Quarter-finals
Goffin D.[5]
Molcan A.[4]
7-56-2
Lajal M.
Herbert P.
6-756-46-4
Nakashima B.
Fognini F.[8]
6-17-5
Draper J.[1]
Harris B.
6-26-3
R16
Harris B.
Albot R.[7]
1-66-36-4
Goffin D.[5]
Passaro F.
6-37-5
Nakashima B.
Broady L.[3]
6-46-0
Fognini F.[8]
Grenier H.
6-726-27-65
Lajal M.
Blanchet U.
6-26-746-2
Herbert P.
Ilkel C.
6-16-1
Draper J.[1]
Vavassori A.
6-36-4
Molcan A.[4]
Brouwer G.
3-67-637-63
R32
Brouwer G.
Gaio F.
6-37-5
Molcan A.[4]
Gigante M.
6-26-2
Fognini F.[8]
Martineau M.
6-36-4
Lajal M.
Sels J.
6-36-2
Herbert P.
Cobolli F.[2]
7-656-3
Ilkel C.
Marchenko I.
6-736-47-5
Passaro F.
Moreno De Alboran N.
7-636-3
Blanchet U.
Riedi L.
7-652-67-5
Draper J.[1]
Maestrelli F.
6-46-4
Broady L.[3]
Fery A.
6-37-64
Nakashima B.
Kukushkin M.
6-16-4
Harris B.
Hemery C.
7-672-66-3
Vavassori A.
Travaglia S.
6-46-2
Grenier H.
Bailly G.
6-26-4
Albot R.[7]
Onclin G.
6-766-06-0
Goffin D.[5]
Vincent Ruggeri S.
6-47-64