Taro Daniel vs Marc Polmans — Sydney CH Final

Sydney CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Taro Daniel
JPN3
Taro Daniel
#194ATP
1567ELO
1512Hard ELO
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 October 2023
hard
Marc Polmans
AUS6
Marc Polmans
#344ATP
1449ELO
1414Hard ELO
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLWWL
Daniel T.
6-2 6-4
Polmans M.
Daniel T.
662
Polmans M.
240

Taro Daniel defeated Marc Polmans 6-2 6-4 in the Sydney CH final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Daniel T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Polmans M.

Polmans M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Daniel T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Daniel T.Polmans M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Even
4.1
4.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 153). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Daniel T.Polmans M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
42
23
Break points saved·Clear edge
93
79
Break points won·Dominant
37
10
Deciding sets·Clear edge
16
31
Tiebreaks·Dominant
81
24

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Daniel T.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Polmans M.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.8+98 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.2Hard Elo 1414
5.7Overall Elo 1567
ELO gap
4.3Overall Elo 1449
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.7
Surface form
6.7
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
1.4
Minutes 14d
8.6
0.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Daniel T.Polmans M.
Freshness·Dominant
69
100

Daniel T.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 75 games (7d) · Polmans M.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Daniel T.[3]
Polmans M.[6]
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Polmans M.[6]
Kokkinakis T.[1]
3-2
Daniel T.[3]
Hijikata R.[2]
3-66-27-65
Quarter-finals
Daniel T.[3]
Mochizuki S.[5]
3-1
Hijikata R.[2]
Nam J.
6-757-57-65
Polmans M.[6]
Mott B.
6-34-66-3
Kokkinakis T.[1]
Noguchi R.
6-37-65
R16
Mochizuki S.[5]
Uchida K.
7-6107-5
Hijikata R.[2]
Wong C.
4-66-36-2
Nam J.
Sweeny D.
6-46-2
Daniel T.[3]
Saville L.
6-46-2
Polmans M.[6]
Weber A.
6-46-4
Noguchi R.
Moriya H.
6-16-2
Kokkinakis T.[1]
Sekulic P.
7-57-5
Mott B.
Seggerman R.
6-26-3
R32
Mochizuki S.[5]
Jasika O.
6-46-4
Daniel T.[3]
Uchiyama Y.
6-22-1
Mott B.
Statham J.
6-36-4
Wong C.
Marinkov P.
7-656-2
Sweeny D.
Takahashi Y.
4-66-37-67
Nam J.
Schoolkate T.[8]
7-696-4
Uchida K.
Shimizu Y.
6-36-2
Weber A.
Bradshaw J.
7-56-2
Seggerman R.
Lock B.
6-34-66-4
Noguchi R.
Hong S.[7]
6-26-2
Moriya H.
Nakagawa N.
6-37-68
Sekulic P.
Rai A.
6-27-62
Kokkinakis T.[1]
Peliwo F.
6-36-1
Polmans M.[6]
Sinclair C.
6-46-2
Hijikata R.[2]
Dellavedova M.
6-36-4
Saville L.
Ellis B.
7-56-2