Nino Serdarusic vs Martin Damm — Charlottesville CH Round of 16

Charlottesville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
CRO
Nino Serdarusic
#1471ATP
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 30 October 2023
hard
Martin Damm
USA
Martin Damm
#104ATP
1706ELO
1657Hard ELO
$338kYTD
$910kCAREER
22 yrs · 203 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
Serdarusic N.
7-6 3-6 6-1
Damm M.
Serdarusic N.
77362
Damm M.
65611

Nino Serdarusic defeated Martin Damm 7-6 3-6 6-1 in the Charlottesville CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Martin Damm came in ranked #104.

Key context

  • Match story: Nino Serdarusic came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 3–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Serdarusic N.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Damm M.

Damm M.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Serdarusic N.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Serdarusic N.Damm M.
1st serve in·Even
63%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
79%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
68%
Return points won·Even
36%
33%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.4
12.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.6
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (93 vs 147). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Serdarusic N.Damm M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
8
26
Break points saved·Dominant
66
93
Break points won·Even
5
1
Deciding sets·Slight edge
10
5
Tiebreaks·Dominant
23
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Serdarusic N.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Damm M.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
1.3
Surface form
7.1
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Serdarusic N.Damm M.
Freshness·
—
97

Damm M.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Zhukayev B.
Mayo A.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Zhukayev B.
Kypson P.
6-47-64
Mayo A.
Quinn E.
3-66-46-3
Quarter-finals
Kypson P.
Holt B.
6-16-4
Quinn E.
Paire B.[3]
7-656-2
Mayo A.
Ritschard A.
6-36-4
Zhukayev B.
Serdarusic N.
6-36-4
R16
Paire B.[3]
Gerch L.
W/O
Mayo A.
Opelka R.
W/O
Holt B.
Kingsley C.
6-46-4
Ritschard A.
Mmoh M.[1]
6-37-65
Zhukayev B.
Montes De La Torre I.
6-47-68
Quinn E.
Nava E.[5]
6-36-1
Kypson P.
Kudla D.[7]
6-16-3
Serdarusic N.
Damm M.
7-653-66-1
R32
Zhukayev B.
Kwiatkowski T.
4-67-637-63
Montes De La Torre I.
Walton A.[6]
6-23-67-64
Quinn E.
Krueger M.
3-67-626-4
Gerch L.
Kozlov S.
6-25-77-65
Opelka R.
Sandgren T.[8]
6-47-5
Ritschard A.
Mchugh A.
6-46-4
Kingsley C.
Michelsen A.[2]
7-56-3
Mayo A.
Ayeni O.
7-56-2
Paire B.[3]
King D.
7-636-2
Mmoh M.[1]
Johnson S.
7-667-5
Kudla D.[7]
Rodesch C.
7-656-1
Serdarusic N.
Spizzirri E.
6-12-66-4
Damm M.
Svajda Z.[4]
2-66-37-63
Holt B.
Gomez E.
6-26-2
Kypson P.
Debru G.
6-47-5
Nava E.[5]
Tomic B.
2-67-617-5