Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva — Guayaquil CH Round of 32

Guayaquil CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
ARG8
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
#58ATP
1759ELO
1741Clay ELO
$653kYTD
$2.7MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 October 2023
clay
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
BRA
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
#250ATP
1486ELO
1470Clay ELO
$76kYTD
$371kCAREER
26 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-4 6-0
Reis Da Silva J.
Ugo Carabelli C.
662
Reis Da Silva J.
400

Camilo Ugo Carabelli defeated Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva 6-4 6-0 in the Guayaquil CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Camilo Ugo Carabelli came in ranked #58.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ugo Carabelli C.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Reis Da Silva J.

Reis Da Silva J.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Ugo Carabelli C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Ugo Carabelli C.Reis Da Silva J.
24
Serve
—
36
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ugo Carabelli C.Reis Da Silva J.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
60%
Return points won·Even
41%
41%
Break points saved·Even
60%
58%
Aces / match·Even
2.7
2.2
Double faults / match·Even
2.4
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ugo Carabelli C.Reis Da Silva J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
78
12
Break points saved·Dominant
90
49
Break points won·Clear edge
62
43
Deciding sets·Dominant
96
9
Tiebreaks·Dominant
72
17

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ugo Carabelli C.
7.8
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Reis Da Silva J.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.5+270 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.5Clay Elo 1470
8.5Overall Elo 1759
ELO gap
1.5Overall Elo 1486
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.6
Surface form
5.5
Fatigue & Travel
7.8
Minutes 14d
8.2
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ugo Carabelli C.Reis Da Silva J.
Freshness·
100
—

Ugo Carabelli C.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Tabilo A.[5]
Galan D.[2]
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Tabilo A.[5]
Burruchaga R.
6-36-4
Galan D.[2]
Meligeni Alves F.[7]
6-47-65
Quarter-finals
Meligeni Alves F.[7]
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
6-13-1
Galan D.[2]
Dellien H.[6]
6-16-2
Tabilo A.[5]
Coria F.[1]
6-746-46-4
Burruchaga R.
Ugo Carabelli C.[8]
6-45-76-1
R16
Ugo Carabelli C.[8]
Darderi L.
4-67-656-2
Dellien H.[6]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-24-66-3
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
Trungelliti M.
6-11-67-65
Meligeni Alves F.[7]
Houkes M.
5-76-36-4
Burruchaga R.
Neumayer L.
5-76-06-4
Coria F.[1]
Agamenone F.
4-66-46-3
Tabilo A.[5]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
4-66-16-2
Galan D.[2]
Ymer E.
6-36-2
R32
Galan D.[2]
Feldbausch K.
6-36-745-0
Ymer E.
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-12-67-65
Darderi L.
Svrcina D.
6-26-3
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
Dellien Velasco M.
6-36-2
Trungelliti M.
Bueno G.
6-06-4
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Andrade A.
6-36-4
Ugo Carabelli C.[8]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-46-0
Tabilo A.[5]
Torres J.
6-46-1
Agamenone F.
Crawford O.
6-34-66-1
Coria F.[1]
Campana Lee G.
6-05-76-1
Dellien H.[6]
Barrena A.
6-27-5
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Boyer T.
6-16-4
Neumayer L.
Guillen Meza A.
6-42-66-4
Burruchaga R.
Cerundolo J.[4]
6-46-2
Houkes M.
Taberner C.
6-36-1
Meligeni Alves F.[7]
Mejia N.
4-66-26-4