Arthur Weber vs Jacob Bradshaw — Sydney CH Round of 32

Sydney CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FRA
Arthur Weber
#403ATP
34 yrs · 185 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 October 2023
hard
AUS
Jacob Bradshaw
#592ATP
23 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLLLW
Weber A.
7-5 6-2
Bradshaw J.
Weber A.
762
Bradshaw J.
520

Arthur Weber defeated Jacob Bradshaw 7-5 6-2 in the Sydney CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Arthur Weber closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Weber A.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Bradshaw J.

Bradshaw J.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Weber A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Weber A.Bradshaw J.
1st serve in·Even
68%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
62%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
59%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
34%
Break points saved·Even
58%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.1
3.5
Double faults / match·Even
1.8
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (63 vs 24). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Weber A.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Bradshaw J.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.7
Surface form
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
7.7
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Daniel T.[3]
Polmans M.[6]
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Polmans M.[6]
Kokkinakis T.[1]
3-2
Daniel T.[3]
Hijikata R.[2]
3-66-27-65
Quarter-finals
Daniel T.[3]
Mochizuki S.[5]
3-1
Hijikata R.[2]
Nam J.
6-757-57-65
Polmans M.[6]
Mott B.
6-34-66-3
Kokkinakis T.[1]
Noguchi R.
6-37-65
R16
Mochizuki S.[5]
Uchida K.
7-6107-5
Hijikata R.[2]
Wong C.
4-66-36-2
Nam J.
Sweeny D.
6-46-2
Daniel T.[3]
Saville L.
6-46-2
Polmans M.[6]
Weber A.
6-46-4
Noguchi R.
Moriya H.
6-16-2
Kokkinakis T.[1]
Sekulic P.
7-57-5
Mott B.
Seggerman R.
6-26-3
R32
Mochizuki S.[5]
Jasika O.
6-46-4
Daniel T.[3]
Uchiyama Y.
6-22-1
Mott B.
Statham J.
6-36-4
Wong C.
Marinkov P.
7-656-2
Sweeny D.
Takahashi Y.
4-66-37-67
Nam J.
Schoolkate T.[8]
7-696-4
Uchida K.
Shimizu Y.
6-36-2
Weber A.
Bradshaw J.
7-56-2
Seggerman R.
Lock B.
6-34-66-4
Noguchi R.
Hong S.[7]
6-26-2
Moriya H.
Nakagawa N.
6-37-68
Sekulic P.
Rai A.
6-27-62
Kokkinakis T.[1]
Peliwo F.
6-36-1
Polmans M.[6]
Sinclair C.
6-46-2
Hijikata R.[2]
Dellavedova M.
6-36-4
Saville L.
Ellis B.
7-56-2