Felix Auger Aliassime vs Jan Lennard Struff — Paris Masters Round of 64

Paris Masters · ATP · Round of 64
Felix Auger Aliassime
CAN
Felix Auger Aliassime
#4ATP
1958ELO
1932Hard ELO
$2.1MYTD
$23MCAREER
25 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 October 2023
hard
Jan Lennard Struff
GER
Jan Lennard Struff
#41ATP
1694ELO
1634Hard ELO
$492kYTD
$13MCAREER
36 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWLWL
Auger Aliassime F.
7-6 6-4
Struff J.
Auger Aliassime F.
7762
Struff J.
6340

Felix Auger Aliassime defeated Jan Lennard Struff 7-6 6-4 in the Paris Masters round of 64 on hard. The result followed the form book — Felix Auger Aliassime came in ranked #4, defending last year's semi-final. Felix Auger Aliassime narrowed the head-to-head to 3–3.

Key context

Head to head

2–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-06-30WimbledonR64grassJan Lennard Struff3-6 7-6(9) 6-3 6-4
2025-01-13Australian OpenR128hardFelix Auger Aliassime6-3 6-0 4-6 6-1
2024-04-15MunichQFclayJan Lennard Struff7-5 6-4
2020-02-10RotterdamR32hardFelix Auger Aliassime6-3 1-6 6-3
2020-01-06Atp CupRRhardJan Lennard Struff6-1 6-4
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Auger Aliassime F.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Struff J.

Struff J.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Auger Aliassime F.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Auger Aliassime F.Struff J.
74
Serve
36
44
Return
40

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Auger Aliassime F.Struff J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
77%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
68%
65%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
64%
64%
Aces / match·Even
9.3
8.8
Double faults / match·Even
3.6
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (197 vs 190). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Auger Aliassime F.Struff J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
84
61
Break points saved·Even
100
99
Break points won·Dominant
50
21
Deciding sets·Dominant
99
68
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
99
94

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Auger Aliassime F.
8.3
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Struff J.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.9+298 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.1Hard Elo 1634
8.6Overall Elo 1958
ELO gap
1.4Overall Elo 1694
5.0
H2H
5.0
8.0
Surface form
3.7
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
0.6
Minutes 14d
6.7
4.0
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
5.4
Country comfort
5.3
Context
8.5
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Auger Aliassime F.Struff J.
Freshness·Even
64
64

Auger Aliassime F.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 57 games (7d) · Struff J.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 34 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
12°CDrizzle
Wind 9 km/hHumidity 92%
Final
Djokovic N.[1]
Dimitrov G.
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Djokovic N.[1]
Rublev A.[5]
5-77-637-5
Dimitrov G.
Tsitsipas S.[7]
6-36-717-63
Quarter-finals
Dimitrov G.
Hurkacz H.[11]
6-14-66-4
Tsitsipas S.[7]
Khachanov K.[16]
6-36-4
Djokovic N.[1]
Rune H.[6]
7-56-736-4
Rublev A.[5]
De Minaur A.[13]
4-66-36-1
R16
De Minaur A.[13]
Sinner J.[4]
W/O
Khachanov K.[16]
Safiullin R.
4-66-46-2
Dimitrov G.
Bublik A.
6-26-2
Rune H.[6]
Altmaier D.
6-36-3
Rublev A.[5]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-36-3
Hurkacz H.[11]
Cerundolo F.
6-46-3
Tsitsipas S.[7]
Zverev A.[10]
7-626-4
Djokovic N.[1]
Griekspoor T.
4-67-626-4
R32
Altmaier D.
Fritz T.[9]
W/O
Bublik A.
Jarry N.
7-637-63
Hurkacz H.[11]
Bautista Agut R.
6-36-2
Djokovic N.[1]
Etcheverry T.
6-36-2
Griekspoor T.
Davidovich Fokina A.
6-26-2
Rune H.[6]
Thiem D.
6-46-2
Sinner J.[4]
Mcdonald M.
6-767-56-1
Van De Zandschulp B.
Paul T.[12]
6-42-66-3
Rublev A.[5]
Nishioka Y.
6-46-3
Cerundolo F.
Ruud C.[8]
7-56-4
Dimitrov G.
Medvedev D.[3]
6-36-747-62
Zverev A.[10]
Humbert U.
6-46-737-65
Khachanov K.[16]
Djere L.
6-47-5
Safiullin R.
Alcaraz C.[2]
6-36-4
Tsitsipas S.[7]
Auger Aliassime F.
6-37-64
De Minaur A.[13]
Lajovic D.
4-66-46-4
R64
Bublik A.
Tiafoe F.[14]
6-36-4
Dimitrov G.
Musetti L.
6-26-746-3
Auger Aliassime F.
Struff J.
7-636-4
Humbert U.
Giron M.
6-46-3
Fritz T.[9]
Baez S.
6-16-4
Paul T.[12]
Gasquet R.
0-66-27-66
Griekspoor T.
Eubanks C.
6-726-36-4
Nishioka Y.
Thompson J.
7-654-66-2
Etcheverry T.
Kecmanovic M.
4-67-666-4
Davidovich Fokina A.
Shelton B.[15]
7-645-76-3
Altmaier D.
Fils A.
6-26-4
Thiem D.
Wawrinka S.
3-66-37-5
Lajovic D.
Bonzi B.
7-56-3
De Minaur A.[13]
Murray A.
7-654-67-5
Van De Zandschulp B.
Mannarino A.
6-47-5
Cerundolo F.
Monfils G.
4-67-627-5
Bautista Agut R.
Lehecka J.
6-46-2
Djere L.
Van Assche L.
6-766-46-4
Safiullin R.
Muller A.
7-646-3
Hurkacz H.[11]
Korda S.
6-36-766-3
Khachanov K.[16]
Purcell M.
6-46-4
Mcdonald M.
Wolf J.
1-66-46-2
Zverev A.[10]
Fucsovics M.
4-67-56-4
Jarry N.
Popyrin A.
7-57-66