Li Tu vs Zack Vialla — Playford CH Round of 32

Playford CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS
Li Tu
#464ATP
1488ELO
1471Hard ELO
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 October 2023
hard
AUS
Zack Vialla
20 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWL
Tu L.
7-5 6-2
Vialla Z.
Tu L.
762
Vialla Z.
520

Li Tu defeated Zack Vialla 7-5 6-2 in the Playford CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Li Tu came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Li Tu closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tu L.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Vialla Z.

Vialla Z.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Tu L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tu L.Vialla Z.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
52%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Even
6.2
6.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.7
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (184 vs 2). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tu L.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Vialla Z.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 658 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.1
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Duckworth J.[4]
Wong C.
7-57-5
Semi-finals
Duckworth J.[4]
Hijikata R.[2]
4-67-56-1
Wong C.
Daniel T.[3]
4-67-657-5
Quarter-finals
Wong C.
Schoolkate T.[8]
6-777-637-62
Hijikata R.[2]
Hong S.[6]
6-16-1
Duckworth J.[4]
Moriya H.
4-66-26-4
Daniel T.[3]
Shimizu Y.
6-16-2
R16
Wong C.
Kokkinakis T.[1]
7-612-0
Duckworth J.[4]
Sekulic P.
7-56-1
Moriya H.
Noguchi R.
7-54-66-2
Hijikata R.[2]
Uchiyama Y.
6-27-5
Shimizu Y.
Polmans M.[5]
6-46-2
Schoolkate T.[8]
Ly N.
3-66-46-2
Daniel T.[3]
Tu L.
6-16-2
Hong S.[6]
Nakagawa N.
6-36-3
R32
Nakagawa N.
Mott B.
5-76-16-3
Shimizu Y.
Wehnelt K.
6-46-4
Wong C.
Rai A.
3-66-26-2
Kokkinakis T.[1]
Takahashi Y.
6-776-36-2
Hijikata R.[2]
Nam J.
6-47-64
Uchiyama Y.
Jasika O.
6-36-2
Hong S.[6]
Court J.
7-676-3
Noguchi R.
Weber A.
6-16-2
Polmans M.[5]
Peliwo F.
6-46-0
Tu L.
Vialla Z.
7-56-2
Schoolkate T.[8]
Marinkov P.
6-36-4
Ly N.
Dellavedova M.
6-46-3
Moriya H.
Sweeny D.[7]
7-656-2
Sekulic P.
Ellis B.
6-37-5
Duckworth J.[4]
Uchida K.
6-47-62
Daniel T.[3]
Bradshaw J.
6-36-1