Nadia Podoroska vs Anna Karolina Schmiedlova — Monastir Round of 32

Monastir · WTA · Round of 32
ARG
Nadia Podoroska
#533WTA
29 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 16 October 2023
hard
SVK5
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova
31 yrs · 176 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWLWLL
Podoroska N.
3-6 6-4 7-5
Schmiedlova A.
Podoroska N.
3672
Schmiedlova A.
6451

Nadia Podoroska defeated Anna Karolina Schmiedlova 3-6 6-4 7-5 in the Monastir round of 32 on hard. Nadia Podoroska extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-08-29US OpenR128hardAnna Karolina Schmiedlova6-3 6-2
2020-09-28Roland GarrosR32clayNadia Podoroska6-3 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Podoroska N.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Schmiedlova A.

Schmiedlova A.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Podoroska N.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Podoroska N.Schmiedlova A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
62%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
44%
Service points won·Even
56%
55%
Return points won·Even
45%
45%
Break points saved·Even
54%
52%
Aces / match·Even
1.6
2.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.9
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (123 vs 110). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Podoroska N.Schmiedlova A.
Clutch Rating·Even
52
48
Break points saved·Clear edge
42
20
Break points won·Even
81
85
Deciding sets·Even
84
88
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
56
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Podoroska N.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Schmiedlova A.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.5
Surface form
2.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
9.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Mertens E.[2]
Paolini J.[1]
6-36-0
Semi-finals
Mertens E.[2]
Burel C.[8]
6-26-1
Paolini J.[1]
Tsurenko L.[4]
6-24-66-2
Quarter-finals
Mertens E.[2]
Hontama M.
6-36-2
Paolini J.[1]
Bronzetti L.[6]
7-57-63
Tsurenko L.[4]
Parrizas Diaz N.
6-36-2
Burel C.[8]
Stefanini L.
6-36-1
R16
Stefanini L.
Kawa K.
6-46-1
Paolini J.[1]
Marcinko P.
6-43-66-2
Bronzetti L.[6]
Errani S.
6-36-4
Parrizas Diaz N.
Zavatska K.
4-67-56-2
Hontama M.
Podoroska N.
6-26-1
Mertens E.[2]
Shymanovich I.
6-36-2
Tsurenko L.[4]
Liu C.
6-17-5
Burel C.[8]
Andreeva E.
6-05-77-62
R32
Stefanini L.
Rosatello C.
5-76-36-1
Paolini J.[1]
Cornet A.
6-46-2
Errani S.
Zidansek T.
6-26-766-3
Bronzetti L.[6]
Kucova K.
6-16-1
Tsurenko L.[4]
Paquet C.
6-26-3
Liu C.
Bektas E.
6-27-65
Parrizas Diaz N.
Frech M.[7]
6-20-66-4
Burel C.[8]
Bucsa C.
6-26-2
Andreeva E.
Semenistaja D.
6-26-0
Kawa K.
Trevisan M.[3]
6-33-67-5
Podoroska N.
Schmiedlova A.[5]
3-66-47-5
Shymanovich I.
Pigossi L.
6-36-2
Mertens E.[2]
Eala A.
7-56-0
Hontama M.
Bolsova A.
4-66-46-0
Marcinko P.
Bassols Ribera M.
7-676-2
Zavatska K.
Bouzas Maneiro J.
6-46-4