Andrea Pellegrino vs Marco Trungelliti — Santa Fe CH Round of 16

Santa Fe CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Andrea Pellegrino
ITA
Andrea Pellegrino
#138ATP
1674ELO
1654Clay ELO
$320kYTD
$1.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 16 October 2023
clay
Marco Trungelliti
ARG
Marco Trungelliti
#99ATP
1627ELO
1621Clay ELO
$395kYTD
$2.6MCAREER
36 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWWL
Pellegrino A.
6-1 2-6 6-4
Trungelliti M.
Pellegrino A.
6262
Trungelliti M.
1641

Andrea Pellegrino defeated Marco Trungelliti 6-1 2-6 6-4 in the Santa Fe CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Marco Trungelliti came in ranked #99, but Andrea Pellegrino had been the form player, winning 4 of their last 6 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Andrea Pellegrino came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 2–6 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Pellegrino A.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Trungelliti M.

Trungelliti M.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Pellegrino A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Pellegrino A.Trungelliti M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Even
58%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.2
3.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Pellegrino A.Trungelliti M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
55
50
Break points saved·Clear edge
67
87
Break points won·Slight edge
35
24
Deciding sets·Slight edge
82
87
Tiebreaks·Dominant
73
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Pellegrino A.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Trungelliti M.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
3.6+33 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
6.4Clay Elo 1621
3.7Overall Elo 1674
ELO gap
6.3Overall Elo 1627
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
7.2
Surface form
6.3
Fatigue & Travel
3.9
Minutes 14d
6.9
0.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Pellegrino A.Trungelliti M.
Freshness·Slight edge
84
95

Pellegrino A.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 47 games (7d) · Trungelliti M.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Navone M.[1]
Vallejo A.
6-26-4
Navone M.
Pellegrino A.
3-66-26-3
Semi-finals
Vallejo A.
Burruchaga R.[3]
4-67-656-4
Navone M.[1]
Comesana F.[4]
7-57-5
Pellegrino A.
Kopriva V.[4]
6-16-3
Navone M.
Monteiro T.
7-56-4
Quarter-finals
Vallejo A.
Monzon I.
6-06-4
Comesana F.[4]
Guillen Meza A.
6-07-63
Navone M.[1]
Farjat T.
6-26-3
Burruchaga R.[3]
Boscardin Dias P.[8]
6-37-5
Monteiro T.
Bagnis F.
6-26-0
Kopriva V.[4]
Delbonis F.
6-46-3
Pellegrino A.
Coria F.[1]
6-03-2
Navone M.
Barrios Vera T.[3]
7-626-4
R16
Monzon I.
Lingua Lavallen A.
7-616-3
Vallejo A.
Franco Descotte M.[9]
3-66-46-1
Comesana F.[4]
Lama G.
6-36-3
Navone M.[1]
Ambrogi L.
6-46-1
Boscardin Dias P.[8]
Kuzuhara B.
7-664-66-3
Farjat T.
Gimenez I.
6-36-736-2
Guillen Meza A.
Soto M.
6-36-1
Burruchaga R.[3]
Tacchi L.
7-626-3
Boscardin Dias P.
Kuzuhara B.
7-664-66-3
Kopriva V.[4]
Burruchaga R.
6-36-0
Barrios Vera T.[3]
Darderi L.
6-44-67-63
Monteiro T.
Taberner C.
6-44-66-1
Bagnis F.
Svrcina D.
6-36-4
Pellegrino A.
Trungelliti M.
6-12-66-4
Coria F.[1]
Kovalik J.
4-67-657-62
Delbonis F.
Meligeni Alves F.[8]
6-16-3
Navone M.
Comesana F.[5]
6-33-66-4
R32
Burruchaga R.[3]
Alves M.
6-23-66-3
Farjat T.
Tenti F.
6-756-46-3
Lingua Lavallen A.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
6-43-66-3
Kuzuhara B.
Catarina L.
6-26-4
Boscardin Dias P.[8]
Brown P.
7-656-3
Guillen Meza A.
Heide G.[5]
6-46-4
Soto M.
Villalon N.
6-27-65
Lama G.
Rodriguez L.
6-36-726-4
Comesana F.[4]
Justo G.
6-26-4
Gimenez I.
Ribeiro E.[6]
6-24-66-4
Ambrogi L.
Carou I.
4-66-36-1
Franco Descotte M.[9]
Ratti L.
6-06-2
Monzon I.
La Serna J.
6-37-5
Vallejo A.
De La Fuente S.
4-66-36-0
Navone M.[1]
Loureiro J.
6-26-4
Kuzuhara B.
Catarina L.
6-26-4
Bagnis F.
Olivieri G.[7]
7-52-0
Darderi L.
Torres J.
6-14-0
Barrios Vera T.[3]
Andreozzi G.
7-636-2
Comesana F.[5]
Bonadio R.
6-46-2
Monteiro T.
Cerundolo J.[2]
6-32-67-64
Taberner C.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-47-5
Navone M.
Barrena A.
6-776-26-2
Kovalik J.
Agamenone F.
6-36-4
Pellegrino A.
Choinski J.[6]
6-43-0
Meligeni Alves F.[8]
Neumayer L.
7-56-1
Coria F.[1]
Mejia N.
6-47-5
Svrcina D.
Ficovich J.
6-36-2
Trungelliti M.
Collarini A.
6-36-4
Delbonis F.
Bicknell B.
6-26-2
Burruchaga R.
Bueno G.
4-66-36-0
Kopriva V.[4]
Vallejo A.
6-00-66-3