Elena Gabriela Ruse vs Alycia Parks — Cluj Napoca Round of 32

Cluj Napoca · WTA · Round of 32
Elena Gabriela Ruse
ROU
Elena Gabriela Ruse
#72WTA
1850ELO
1754Hard ELO
28 yrs · 172 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 16 October 2023
hard
Alycia Parks
USA2
Alycia Parks
#70WTA
1648ELO
1639Hard ELO
25 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLLLWLW
Ruse E.
6-2 1-6 6-4
Parks A.
Ruse E.
6162
Parks A.
2641

Elena Gabriela Ruse defeated Alycia Parks 6-2 1-6 6-4 in the Cluj Napoca round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ruse E.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Parks A.

Parks A.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Ruse E.

Serve advantage — Ruse E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Ruse E.Parks A.
0
Serve
28
32
Return
20

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ruse E.Parks A.
1st serve in·Even
58%
55%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
43%
Service points won·Even
58%
58%
Return points won·Slight edge
46%
41%
Break points saved·Even
55%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.2
6.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.3
7.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (161 vs 193). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ruse E.Parks A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
66
61
Break points saved·Slight edge
72
79
Break points won·Dominant
98
66
Deciding sets·Dominant
97
64
Tiebreaks·Dominant
5
87

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ruse E.
4.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 161 days (−1.5)
Parks A.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.7+115 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.3Hard Elo 1639
6.1Overall Elo 1850
ELO gap
3.9Overall Elo 1648
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.4
Surface form
2.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.8
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ruse E.Parks A.
Freshness·Even
98
97

Ruse E.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Parks A.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Korpatsch T.
Ruse E.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Ruse E.
Masarova R.[4]
6-16-4
Korpatsch T.
Lys E.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Lys E.
Makarova E.
6-26-2
Korpatsch T.
Snigur D.
3-66-26-4
Ruse E.
Arango E.
6-10-66-1
Masarova R.[4]
Bogdan A.[5]
3-67-646-3
R16
Lys E.
Cristian J.
2-67-56-2
Makarova E.
Tig P.
6-22-66-3
Snigur D.
Friedsam A.
6-01-66-4
Bogdan A.[5]
Bartunkova N.
4-67-657-5
Masarova R.[4]
Bulgaru M.
3-67-686-0
Arango E.
Teichmann J.
6-36-3
Korpatsch T.
Burrage J.[8]
2-66-27-65
Ruse E.
Bondar A.
7-646-2
R32
Ruse E.
Parks A.[2]
6-21-66-4
Teichmann J.
Wickmayer Y.[6]
6-47-66
Snigur D.
Minnen G.[3]
6-36-2
Burrage J.[8]
Raina A.
6-06-2
Bulgaru M.
Oz I.
7-56-3
Masarova R.[4]
Noha Akugue N.
6-46-0
Friedsam A.
Ghioroaie Y.
6-16-1
Bartunkova N.
Yastremska D.
7-56-4
Bondar A.
Soboleva A.
5-76-26-3
Arango E.
Ponchet J.
6-37-64
Tig P.
Matoula M.
6-46-756-3
Korpatsch T.
Jeanjean L.
6-42-66-3
Bogdan A.[5]
Tomova V.
6-46-1
Cristian J.
Naef C.
6-46-4
Makarova E.
Baindl K.[7]
6-31-66-1
Lys E.
Cirstea S.[1]
6-36-3