Lesia Tsurenko vs Chloe Paquet — Monastir Round of 32

Monastir · WTA · Round of 32
UKR4
Lesia Tsurenko
37 yrs · 174 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 October 2023
hard
Chloe Paquet
FRA
Chloe Paquet
#297WTA
1479ELO
1432Hard ELO
32 yrs · 179 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWLWW
Tsurenko L.
6-2 6-3
Paquet C.
Tsurenko L.
662
Paquet C.
230

Lesia Tsurenko defeated Chloe Paquet 6-2 6-3 in the Monastir round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Lesia Tsurenko came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Lesia Tsurenko extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-02-27AcapulcoR32hardLesia Tsurenko6-2 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Tsurenko L.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Paquet C.

Paquet C.serving55% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Tsurenko L.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tsurenko L.Paquet C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
58%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
43%
43%
Service points won·Even
53%
55%
Return points won·Slight edge
49%
43%
Break points saved·Even
53%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
0.2
3.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.8
4.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (92 vs 146). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tsurenko L.Paquet C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
64
8
Break points saved·Clear edge
37
51
Break points won·Dominant
94
69
Deciding sets·Dominant
90
0
Tiebreaks·Dominant
85
29

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tsurenko L.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Paquet C.
3.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 84 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.4
Surface form
1.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.9
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Mertens E.[2]
Paolini J.[1]
6-36-0
Semi-finals
Mertens E.[2]
Burel C.[8]
6-26-1
Paolini J.[1]
Tsurenko L.[4]
6-24-66-2
Quarter-finals
Mertens E.[2]
Hontama M.
6-36-2
Paolini J.[1]
Bronzetti L.[6]
7-57-63
Tsurenko L.[4]
Parrizas Diaz N.
6-36-2
Burel C.[8]
Stefanini L.
6-36-1
R16
Stefanini L.
Kawa K.
6-46-1
Paolini J.[1]
Marcinko P.
6-43-66-2
Bronzetti L.[6]
Errani S.
6-36-4
Parrizas Diaz N.
Zavatska K.
4-67-56-2
Hontama M.
Podoroska N.
6-26-1
Mertens E.[2]
Shymanovich I.
6-36-2
Tsurenko L.[4]
Liu C.
6-17-5
Burel C.[8]
Andreeva E.
6-05-77-62
R32
Stefanini L.
Rosatello C.
5-76-36-1
Paolini J.[1]
Cornet A.
6-46-2
Errani S.
Zidansek T.
6-26-766-3
Bronzetti L.[6]
Kucova K.
6-16-1
Tsurenko L.[4]
Paquet C.
6-26-3
Liu C.
Bektas E.
6-27-65
Parrizas Diaz N.
Frech M.[7]
6-20-66-4
Burel C.[8]
Bucsa C.
6-26-2
Andreeva E.
Semenistaja D.
6-26-0
Kawa K.
Trevisan M.[3]
6-33-67-5
Podoroska N.
Schmiedlova A.[5]
3-66-47-5
Shymanovich I.
Pigossi L.
6-36-2
Mertens E.[2]
Eala A.
7-56-0
Hontama M.
Bolsova A.
4-66-46-0
Marcinko P.
Bassols Ribera M.
7-676-2
Zavatska K.
Bouzas Maneiro J.
6-46-4