Patricia Maria Tig vs Martha Matoula — Cluj Napoca Round of 32

Cluj Napoca · WTA · Round of 32
ROU
Patricia Maria Tig
#810WTA
31 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 16 October 2023
hard
GRE
Martha Matoula
#301WTA
1400ELO
1339Hard ELO
29 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLLWL
Tig P.
6-4 6-7 6-3
Matoula M.
Tig P.
66562
Matoula M.
47731

Patricia Maria Tig defeated Martha Matoula 6-4 6-7 6-3 in the Cluj Napoca round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tig P.serving52% hold

wins 51% of points on serve vs Matoula M.

Matoula M.serving60% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Tig P.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tig P.Matoula M.
1st serve in·Even
60%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
61%
58%
2nd serve points won·Even
41%
43%
Service points won·Even
53%
53%
Return points won·Even
45%
48%
Break points saved·Even
54%
52%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.9
0.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.7
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (55 vs 77). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tig P.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Matoula M.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 549 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.3
Surface form
0.0Lost last 6
Win streak
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tig P.Matoula M.
Freshness·
—
95

Matoula M.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 20 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Korpatsch T.
Ruse E.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Ruse E.
Masarova R.[4]
6-16-4
Korpatsch T.
Lys E.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Lys E.
Makarova E.
6-26-2
Korpatsch T.
Snigur D.
3-66-26-4
Ruse E.
Arango E.
6-10-66-1
Masarova R.[4]
Bogdan A.[5]
3-67-646-3
R16
Lys E.
Cristian J.
2-67-56-2
Makarova E.
Tig P.
6-22-66-3
Snigur D.
Friedsam A.
6-01-66-4
Bogdan A.[5]
Bartunkova N.
4-67-657-5
Masarova R.[4]
Bulgaru M.
3-67-686-0
Arango E.
Teichmann J.
6-36-3
Korpatsch T.
Burrage J.[8]
2-66-27-65
Ruse E.
Bondar A.
7-646-2
R32
Ruse E.
Parks A.[2]
6-21-66-4
Teichmann J.
Wickmayer Y.[6]
6-47-66
Snigur D.
Minnen G.[3]
6-36-2
Burrage J.[8]
Raina A.
6-06-2
Bulgaru M.
Oz I.
7-56-3
Masarova R.[4]
Noha Akugue N.
6-46-0
Friedsam A.
Ghioroaie Y.
6-16-1
Bartunkova N.
Yastremska D.
7-56-4
Bondar A.
Soboleva A.
5-76-26-3
Arango E.
Ponchet J.
6-37-64
Tig P.
Matoula M.
6-46-756-3
Korpatsch T.
Jeanjean L.
6-42-66-3
Bogdan A.[5]
Tomova V.
6-46-1
Cristian J.
Naef C.
6-46-4
Makarova E.
Baindl K.[7]
6-31-66-1
Lys E.
Cirstea S.[1]
6-36-3