Dennis Novak vs Tristan Lamasine — Hamburg CH Semi-final

Hamburg CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
AUT1
Dennis Novak
#818ATP
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 16 October 2023
hard
FRA
Tristan Lamasine
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLLWWLL
Novak D.
4-6 6-3 6-4
Lamasine T.
Novak D.
4662
Lamasine T.
6341

Dennis Novak defeated Tristan Lamasine 4-6 6-3 6-4 in the Hamburg CH semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Dennis Novak came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Novak D.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Lamasine T.

Lamasine T.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Novak D.

Serve advantage — Novak D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Novak D.Lamasine T.
1st serve in·Even
65%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
47%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
41%
40%
Break points saved·Even
59%
55%
Aces / match·Even
3.2
2.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.2
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (126 vs 85). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Novak D.Lamasine T.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
36
21
Break points saved·Dominant
80
38
Break points won·Even
15
17
Deciding sets·Clear edge
33
51
Tiebreaks·Dominant
77
43

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Novak D.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Lamasine T.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.1
Surface form
6.0
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
3.4
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Marchenko I.
Novak D.[1]
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Marchenko I.
Harris B.
7-53-67-5
Novak D.[1]
Lamasine T.
4-66-36-4
Quarter-finals
Harris B.
Valkusz M.[3]
4-66-06-2
Marchenko I.
Walton A.[2]
6-46-1
Novak D.[1]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-26-2
Lamasine T.
Santillan A.
6-46-2
R16
Marchenko I.
Celikbilek A.
6-43-67-63
Lamasine T.
Neuchrist M.[7]
7-56-4
Barranco Cosano J.
Debru G.
6-32-66-4
Valkusz M.[3]
Napolitano S.
6-756-46-4
Walton A.[2]
Sels J.
3-66-36-3
Harris B.
Ilkel C.[6]
7-646-1
Santillan A.
Moeller M.
6-47-5
Novak D.[1]
Bellier A.
6-37-5
R32
Ilkel C.[6]
Laaksonen H.
6-23-1
Novak D.[1]
Topo M.
7-626-1
Harris B.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-46-2
Santillan A.
Molleker R.[4]
6-36-4
Barranco Cosano J.
Added D.
6-25-76-4
Bellier A.
Gerch L.
6-37-65
Sels J.
Ivanovski K.
6-26-4
Walton A.[2]
Kirkin E.
6-26-4
Celikbilek A.
Mukund S.
7-57-63
Marchenko I.
Krutykh O.[8]
6-26-3
Napolitano S.
Masur D.
1-66-26-4
Neuchrist M.[7]
Echargui M.
6-46-4
Moeller M.
Gombos N.
6-27-5
Debru G.
Ferreira Silva F.[5]
6-46-1
Lamasine T.
Guinard M.
6-06-0
Valkusz M.[3]
Serdarusic N.
6-46-4