Cem Ilkel vs Henri Laaksonen — Hamburg CH Round of 32

Hamburg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Cem Ilkel
TUR6
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 16 October 2023
hard
SUI
Henri Laaksonen
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWL
Ilkel C.
6-2 3-1
Laaksonen H.
Ilkel C.
63–
Laaksonen H.
21–

Cem Ilkel advanced when Henri Laaksonen retired 6-2 3-1 in the Hamburg CH round of 32.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ilkel C.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Laaksonen H.

Laaksonen H.serving75% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Serve advantage — Ilkel C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ilkel C.Laaksonen H.
1st serve in·Even
58%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
47%
Service points won·Even
62%
58%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
56%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.6
3.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (90 vs 40). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ilkel C.Laaksonen H.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
32
51
Break points saved·Dominant
49
84
Break points won·Clear edge
3
20
Deciding sets·Clear edge
70
92
Tiebreaks·Dominant
66
25

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ilkel C.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Laaksonen H.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.1
Surface form
1.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.3
Minutes 14d
6.8
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Marchenko I.
Novak D.[1]
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Marchenko I.
Harris B.
7-53-67-5
Novak D.[1]
Lamasine T.
4-66-36-4
Quarter-finals
Harris B.
Valkusz M.[3]
4-66-06-2
Marchenko I.
Walton A.[2]
6-46-1
Novak D.[1]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-26-2
Lamasine T.
Santillan A.
6-46-2
R16
Marchenko I.
Celikbilek A.
6-43-67-63
Lamasine T.
Neuchrist M.[7]
7-56-4
Barranco Cosano J.
Debru G.
6-32-66-4
Valkusz M.[3]
Napolitano S.
6-756-46-4
Walton A.[2]
Sels J.
3-66-36-3
Harris B.
Ilkel C.[6]
7-646-1
Santillan A.
Moeller M.
6-47-5
Novak D.[1]
Bellier A.
6-37-5
R32
Ilkel C.[6]
Laaksonen H.
6-23-1
Novak D.[1]
Topo M.
7-626-1
Harris B.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-46-2
Santillan A.
Molleker R.[4]
6-36-4
Barranco Cosano J.
Added D.
6-25-76-4
Bellier A.
Gerch L.
6-37-65
Sels J.
Ivanovski K.
6-26-4
Walton A.[2]
Kirkin E.
6-26-4
Celikbilek A.
Mukund S.
7-57-63
Marchenko I.
Krutykh O.[8]
6-26-3
Napolitano S.
Masur D.
1-66-26-4
Neuchrist M.[7]
Echargui M.
6-46-4
Moeller M.
Gombos N.
6-27-5
Debru G.
Ferreira Silva F.[5]
6-46-1
Lamasine T.
Guinard M.
6-06-0
Valkusz M.[3]
Serdarusic N.
6-46-4