Mai Hontama vs Nadia Podoroska — Monastir Round of 16

Monastir · WTA · Round of 16
Mai Hontama
JPN
Mai Hontama
#202WTA
1480ELO
1442Hard ELO
26 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 October 2023
hard
ARG
Nadia Podoroska
#533WTA
29 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWWW
Hontama M.
6-2 6-1
Podoroska N.
Hontama M.
662
Podoroska N.
210

Mai Hontama defeated Nadia Podoroska 6-2 6-1 in the Monastir round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Mai Hontama came in ranked #202, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Mai Hontama extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-09-11OsakaR16hardMai Hontama6-3 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Hontama M.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Podoroska N.

Podoroska N.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Hontama M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Hontama M.Podoroska N.
1st serve in·Even
66%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
59%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
45%
Service points won·Even
54%
56%
Return points won·Even
46%
45%
Break points saved·Even
53%
54%
Aces / match·Even
1.1
1.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.2
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (154 vs 123). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Hontama M.Podoroska N.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
29
52
Break points saved·Clear edge
27
42
Break points won·Clear edge
96
81
Deciding sets·Dominant
28
84
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
68
56

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Hontama M.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Podoroska N.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0
H2H
0.0
6.1
Surface form
4.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
9.2
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Hontama M.Podoroska N.
Freshness·
100
—

Hontama M.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Mertens E.[2]
Paolini J.[1]
6-36-0
Semi-finals
Mertens E.[2]
Burel C.[8]
6-26-1
Paolini J.[1]
Tsurenko L.[4]
6-24-66-2
Quarter-finals
Mertens E.[2]
Hontama M.
6-36-2
Paolini J.[1]
Bronzetti L.[6]
7-57-63
Tsurenko L.[4]
Parrizas Diaz N.
6-36-2
Burel C.[8]
Stefanini L.
6-36-1
R16
Stefanini L.
Kawa K.
6-46-1
Paolini J.[1]
Marcinko P.
6-43-66-2
Bronzetti L.[6]
Errani S.
6-36-4
Parrizas Diaz N.
Zavatska K.
4-67-56-2
Hontama M.
Podoroska N.
6-26-1
Mertens E.[2]
Shymanovich I.
6-36-2
Tsurenko L.[4]
Liu C.
6-17-5
Burel C.[8]
Andreeva E.
6-05-77-62
R32
Stefanini L.
Rosatello C.
5-76-36-1
Paolini J.[1]
Cornet A.
6-46-2
Errani S.
Zidansek T.
6-26-766-3
Bronzetti L.[6]
Kucova K.
6-16-1
Tsurenko L.[4]
Paquet C.
6-26-3
Liu C.
Bektas E.
6-27-65
Parrizas Diaz N.
Frech M.[7]
6-20-66-4
Burel C.[8]
Bucsa C.
6-26-2
Andreeva E.
Semenistaja D.
6-26-0
Kawa K.
Trevisan M.[3]
6-33-67-5
Podoroska N.
Schmiedlova A.[5]
3-66-47-5
Shymanovich I.
Pigossi L.
6-36-2
Mertens E.[2]
Eala A.
7-56-0
Hontama M.
Bolsova A.
4-66-46-0
Marcinko P.
Bassols Ribera M.
7-676-2
Zavatska K.
Bouzas Maneiro J.
6-46-4