Billy Harris vs Cem Ilkel — Hamburg CH Round of 16

Hamburg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Billy Harris
GBR
Billy Harris
#154ATP
1508ELO
1473Hard ELO
$236kYTD
$1.5MCAREER
31 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 October 2023
hard
Cem Ilkel
TUR6
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
Harris B.
7-6 6-1
Ilkel C.
Harris B.
7762
Ilkel C.
6410

Billy Harris defeated Cem Ilkel 7-6 6-1 in the Hamburg CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Billy Harris came in ranked #154, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Billy Harris came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Harris B.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Ilkel C.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Harris B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Harris B.Ilkel C.
1st serve in·Even
62%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
55%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.9
4.6
Double faults / match·Even
2.4
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 90). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Harris B.Ilkel C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
46
32
Break points saved·Dominant
91
49
Break points won·Slight edge
10
3
Deciding sets·Clear edge
82
70
Tiebreaks·Dominant
23
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Harris B.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ilkel C.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.1
Surface form
3.1
7.04-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
1.3
Minutes 14d
8.3
4.0
3-set count
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Harris B.Ilkel C.
Freshness·
96
—

Harris B.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Marchenko I.
Novak D.[1]
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Marchenko I.
Harris B.
7-53-67-5
Novak D.[1]
Lamasine T.
4-66-36-4
Quarter-finals
Harris B.
Valkusz M.[3]
4-66-06-2
Marchenko I.
Walton A.[2]
6-46-1
Novak D.[1]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-26-2
Lamasine T.
Santillan A.
6-46-2
R16
Marchenko I.
Celikbilek A.
6-43-67-63
Lamasine T.
Neuchrist M.[7]
7-56-4
Barranco Cosano J.
Debru G.
6-32-66-4
Valkusz M.[3]
Napolitano S.
6-756-46-4
Walton A.[2]
Sels J.
3-66-36-3
Harris B.
Ilkel C.[6]
7-646-1
Santillan A.
Moeller M.
6-47-5
Novak D.[1]
Bellier A.
6-37-5
R32
Ilkel C.[6]
Laaksonen H.
6-23-1
Novak D.[1]
Topo M.
7-626-1
Harris B.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-46-2
Santillan A.
Molleker R.[4]
6-36-4
Barranco Cosano J.
Added D.
6-25-76-4
Bellier A.
Gerch L.
6-37-65
Sels J.
Ivanovski K.
6-26-4
Walton A.[2]
Kirkin E.
6-26-4
Celikbilek A.
Mukund S.
7-57-63
Marchenko I.
Krutykh O.[8]
6-26-3
Napolitano S.
Masur D.
1-66-26-4
Neuchrist M.[7]
Echargui M.
6-46-4
Moeller M.
Gombos N.
6-27-5
Debru G.
Ferreira Silva F.[5]
6-46-1
Lamasine T.
Guinard M.
6-06-0
Valkusz M.[3]
Serdarusic N.
6-46-4