Dennis Novak vs Javier Barranco Cosano — Hamburg CH Quarter-final

Hamburg CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
AUT1
Dennis Novak
#818ATP
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 October 2023
hard
ESP
Javier Barranco Cosano
#433ATP
1457ELO
1399Hard ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLLLLW
Novak D.
6-2 6-2
Barranco Cosano J.
Novak D.
662
Barranco Cosano J.
220

Dennis Novak defeated Javier Barranco Cosano 6-2 6-2 in the Hamburg CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Novak D.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Barranco Cosano J.

Barranco Cosano J.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Novak D.

Serve advantage — Novak D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Novak D.Barranco Cosano J.
1st serve in·Even
65%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
59%
Return points won·Even
41%
42%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.3
2.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.2
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (126 vs 135). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Novak D.Barranco Cosano J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
36
14
Break points saved·Slight edge
80
70
Break points won·Clear edge
15
33
Deciding sets·Dominant
33
5
Tiebreaks·Dominant
77
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Novak D.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Barranco Cosano J.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.1
Surface form
2.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
3.4
Minutes 14d
5.8
7.0
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Marchenko I.
Novak D.[1]
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Marchenko I.
Harris B.
7-53-67-5
Novak D.[1]
Lamasine T.
4-66-36-4
Quarter-finals
Harris B.
Valkusz M.[3]
4-66-06-2
Marchenko I.
Walton A.[2]
6-46-1
Novak D.[1]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-26-2
Lamasine T.
Santillan A.
6-46-2
R16
Marchenko I.
Celikbilek A.
6-43-67-63
Lamasine T.
Neuchrist M.[7]
7-56-4
Barranco Cosano J.
Debru G.
6-32-66-4
Valkusz M.[3]
Napolitano S.
6-756-46-4
Walton A.[2]
Sels J.
3-66-36-3
Harris B.
Ilkel C.[6]
7-646-1
Santillan A.
Moeller M.
6-47-5
Novak D.[1]
Bellier A.
6-37-5
R32
Ilkel C.[6]
Laaksonen H.
6-23-1
Novak D.[1]
Topo M.
7-626-1
Harris B.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-46-2
Santillan A.
Molleker R.[4]
6-36-4
Barranco Cosano J.
Added D.
6-25-76-4
Bellier A.
Gerch L.
6-37-65
Sels J.
Ivanovski K.
6-26-4
Walton A.[2]
Kirkin E.
6-26-4
Celikbilek A.
Mukund S.
7-57-63
Marchenko I.
Krutykh O.[8]
6-26-3
Napolitano S.
Masur D.
1-66-26-4
Neuchrist M.[7]
Echargui M.
6-46-4
Moeller M.
Gombos N.
6-27-5
Debru G.
Ferreira Silva F.[5]
6-46-1
Lamasine T.
Guinard M.
6-06-0
Valkusz M.[3]
Serdarusic N.
6-46-4