Illya Marchenko vs Altug Celikbilek — Hamburg CH Round of 16

Hamburg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
UKR
Illya Marchenko
#1740ATP
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 16 October 2023
hard
TUR
Altug Celikbilek
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
Marchenko I.
6-4 3-6 7-6
Celikbilek A.
Marchenko I.
63772
Celikbilek A.
46631

Illya Marchenko defeated Altug Celikbilek 6-4 3-6 7-6 in the Hamburg CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Altug Celikbilek came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Illya Marchenko closed it out in three sets, 6–4 3–6 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Marchenko I.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Celikbilek A.

Celikbilek A.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Marchenko I.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Marchenko I.Celikbilek A.
1st serve in·Even
56%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Even
5.7
6.3
Double faults / match·Even
3.4
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (95 vs 68). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Marchenko I.Celikbilek A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
13
40
Break points saved·Slight edge
80
73
Break points won·Dominant
7
38
Deciding sets·Dominant
13
57
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
10
26

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Marchenko I.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Celikbilek A.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.6
Surface form
5.7
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
4.3
Minutes 14d
8.4
4.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Marchenko I.
Novak D.[1]
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Marchenko I.
Harris B.
7-53-67-5
Novak D.[1]
Lamasine T.
4-66-36-4
Quarter-finals
Harris B.
Valkusz M.[3]
4-66-06-2
Marchenko I.
Walton A.[2]
6-46-1
Novak D.[1]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-26-2
Lamasine T.
Santillan A.
6-46-2
R16
Marchenko I.
Celikbilek A.
6-43-67-63
Lamasine T.
Neuchrist M.[7]
7-56-4
Barranco Cosano J.
Debru G.
6-32-66-4
Valkusz M.[3]
Napolitano S.
6-756-46-4
Walton A.[2]
Sels J.
3-66-36-3
Harris B.
Ilkel C.[6]
7-646-1
Santillan A.
Moeller M.
6-47-5
Novak D.[1]
Bellier A.
6-37-5
R32
Ilkel C.[6]
Laaksonen H.
6-23-1
Novak D.[1]
Topo M.
7-626-1
Harris B.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-46-2
Santillan A.
Molleker R.[4]
6-36-4
Barranco Cosano J.
Added D.
6-25-76-4
Bellier A.
Gerch L.
6-37-65
Sels J.
Ivanovski K.
6-26-4
Walton A.[2]
Kirkin E.
6-26-4
Celikbilek A.
Mukund S.
7-57-63
Marchenko I.
Krutykh O.[8]
6-26-3
Napolitano S.
Masur D.
1-66-26-4
Neuchrist M.[7]
Echargui M.
6-46-4
Moeller M.
Gombos N.
6-27-5
Debru G.
Ferreira Silva F.[5]
6-46-1
Lamasine T.
Guinard M.
6-06-0
Valkusz M.[3]
Serdarusic N.
6-46-4