Arthur Cazaux vs Matteo Gigante — Olbia CH Round of 32

Olbia CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Arthur Cazaux
FRA
Arthur Cazaux
#98ATP
1793ELO
1738Hard ELO
$46kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 October 2023
hard
Matteo Gigante
ITA
Matteo Gigante
#526ATP
1592ELO
1534Hard ELO
24 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
Cazaux A.
6-2 6-2
Gigante M.
Cazaux A.
662
Gigante M.
220

Arthur Cazaux defeated Matteo Gigante 6-2 6-2 in the Olbia CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Arthur Cazaux came in ranked #98.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cazaux A.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Gigante M.

Gigante M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Cazaux A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Cazaux A.Gigante M.
40
Serve
—
19
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Cazaux A.Gigante M.
1st serve in·Even
59%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.8
3.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.2
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 170). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cazaux A.Gigante M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
65
58
Break points saved·Clear edge
97
78
Break points won·Slight edge
27
35
Deciding sets·Even
87
89
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
70
54

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cazaux A.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Gigante M.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.5+204 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.5Hard Elo 1534
7.5Overall Elo 1793
ELO gap
2.5Overall Elo 1592
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.5
Surface form
6.2
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
6.5
Minutes 14d
8.8
4.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
7.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Jacquet K.
Cobolli F.[7]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Jacquet K.
De Loore J.
6-44-67-65
Cobolli F.[7]
Molcan A.[4]
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Cobolli F.[7]
Lestienne C.[2]
7-57-64
De Loore J.
Forti F.
6-46-4
Jacquet K.
Blanchet U.
6-04-66-2
Molcan A.[4]
Bellucci M.
6-36-2
R16
Cobolli F.[7]
Gaio F.
6-26-4
Bellucci M.
Brancaccio R.
6-46-4
Forti F.
Bourgue M.
6-46-1
Jacquet K.
Martinez P.[5]
6-37-62
Blanchet U.
Muller A.[1]
7-686-4
Lestienne C.[2]
Cazaux A.
6-26-4
De Loore J.
Harris L.
6-37-66
Molcan A.[4]
Copil M.
6-26-2
R32
Lestienne C.[2]
Rincon D.
6-36-4
Molcan A.[4]
Kuzmanov D.
7-650-0
Copil M.
Maestrelli F.
6-36-4
Bourgue M.
Moutet C.[6]
7-641-66-1
De Loore J.
Tirante T.[3]
6-36-2
Jacquet K.
Orlov V.
5-76-36-4
Muller A.[1]
Fognini F.
3-67-657-63
Bellucci M.
Paire B.[8]
6-43-66-2
Forti F.
Peniston R.
3-66-46-4
Cazaux A.
Gigante M.
6-26-2
Harris L.
Giannessi A.
7-636-0
Blanchet U.
Kolar Z.
7-56-1
Brancaccio R.
Bertola R.
7-55-76-3
Cobolli F.[7]
Nava E.
6-26-776-3
Gaio F.
Mayot H.
6-26-0
Martinez P.[5]
Carboni L.
6-36-3