Jodie Burrage vs Ankita Raina — Cluj Napoca Round of 32

Cluj Napoca · WTA · Round of 32
Jodie Burrage
GBR8
Jodie Burrage
#920WTA
1484ELO
1481Hard ELO
27 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 October 2023
hard
IND
Ankita Raina
#681WTA
1252ELO
1225Hard ELO
33 yrs · 163 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWLWW
Burrage J.
6-0 6-2
Raina A.
Burrage J.
662
Raina A.
020

Jodie Burrage defeated Ankita Raina 6-0 6-2 in the Cluj Napoca round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Jodie Burrage came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Jodie Burrage extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-07-24WarsawR32clayJodie Burrage4-6 6-4 7-6(4)

Serve vs return

This season
Burrage J.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Raina A.

Raina A.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Burrage J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Burrage J.Raina A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
70%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
56%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
46%
Service points won·Even
57%
53%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
46%
Break points saved·Even
53%
52%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.6
0.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.0
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (89 vs 80). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Burrage J.Raina A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
10
0
Break points saved·Dominant
44
7
Break points won·Slight edge
65
59
Deciding sets·Even
4
4
Tiebreaks·Dominant
46
6

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Burrage J.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Raina A.
3.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
8.2+256 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.8Hard Elo 1225
8.1Overall Elo 1484
ELO gap
1.9Overall Elo 1252
5.0
H2H
5.0
1.8
Surface form
3.3
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Korpatsch T.
Ruse E.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Ruse E.
Masarova R.[4]
6-16-4
Korpatsch T.
Lys E.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Lys E.
Makarova E.
6-26-2
Korpatsch T.
Snigur D.
3-66-26-4
Ruse E.
Arango E.
6-10-66-1
Masarova R.[4]
Bogdan A.[5]
3-67-646-3
R16
Lys E.
Cristian J.
2-67-56-2
Makarova E.
Tig P.
6-22-66-3
Snigur D.
Friedsam A.
6-01-66-4
Bogdan A.[5]
Bartunkova N.
4-67-657-5
Masarova R.[4]
Bulgaru M.
3-67-686-0
Arango E.
Teichmann J.
6-36-3
Korpatsch T.
Burrage J.[8]
2-66-27-65
Ruse E.
Bondar A.
7-646-2
R32
Ruse E.
Parks A.[2]
6-21-66-4
Teichmann J.
Wickmayer Y.[6]
6-47-66
Snigur D.
Minnen G.[3]
6-36-2
Burrage J.[8]
Raina A.
6-06-2
Bulgaru M.
Oz I.
7-56-3
Masarova R.[4]
Noha Akugue N.
6-46-0
Friedsam A.
Ghioroaie Y.
6-16-1
Bartunkova N.
Yastremska D.
7-56-4
Bondar A.
Soboleva A.
5-76-26-3
Arango E.
Ponchet J.
6-37-64
Tig P.
Matoula M.
6-46-756-3
Korpatsch T.
Jeanjean L.
6-42-66-3
Bogdan A.[5]
Tomova V.
6-46-1
Cristian J.
Naef C.
6-46-4
Makarova E.
Baindl K.[7]
6-31-66-1
Lys E.
Cirstea S.[1]
6-36-3