Elena Gabriela Ruse vs Anna Bondar — Cluj Napoca Round of 16

Cluj Napoca · WTA · Round of 16
Elena Gabriela Ruse
ROU
Elena Gabriela Ruse
#72WTA
1850ELO
1754Hard ELO
28 yrs · 172 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 October 2023
hard
Anna Bondar
HUN
Anna Bondar
#73WTA
1735ELO
1654Hard ELO
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLWLLWW
Ruse E.
7-6 6-2
Bondar A.
Ruse E.
7762
Bondar A.
6420

Elena Gabriela Ruse defeated Anna Bondar 7-6 6-2 in the Cluj Napoca round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Elena Gabriela Ruse came in ranked #72, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ruse E.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Bondar A.

Bondar A.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Ruse E.

Serve advantage — Ruse E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Ruse E.Bondar A.
0
Serve
32
32
Return
27

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ruse E.Bondar A.
1st serve in·Even
58%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
48%
Service points won·Even
58%
58%
Return points won·Even
46%
42%
Break points saved·Even
54%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.2
4.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.3
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (161 vs 176). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ruse E.Bondar A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
66
51
Break points saved·Clear edge
72
88
Break points won·Clear edge
98
77
Deciding sets·Dominant
97
27
Tiebreaks·Dominant
5
78

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ruse E.
3.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 161 days (−1.5)
Bondar A.
4.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 84 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
5.8+100 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.2Hard Elo 1654
5.5Overall Elo 1850
ELO gap
4.5Overall Elo 1735
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.4
Surface form
2.4
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ruse E.Bondar A.
Freshness·Clear edge
98
86

Ruse E.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Bondar A.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 22 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Korpatsch T.
Ruse E.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Ruse E.
Masarova R.[4]
6-16-4
Korpatsch T.
Lys E.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Lys E.
Makarova E.
6-26-2
Korpatsch T.
Snigur D.
3-66-26-4
Ruse E.
Arango E.
6-10-66-1
Masarova R.[4]
Bogdan A.[5]
3-67-646-3
R16
Lys E.
Cristian J.
2-67-56-2
Makarova E.
Tig P.
6-22-66-3
Snigur D.
Friedsam A.
6-01-66-4
Bogdan A.[5]
Bartunkova N.
4-67-657-5
Masarova R.[4]
Bulgaru M.
3-67-686-0
Arango E.
Teichmann J.
6-36-3
Korpatsch T.
Burrage J.[8]
2-66-27-65
Ruse E.
Bondar A.
7-646-2
R32
Ruse E.
Parks A.[2]
6-21-66-4
Teichmann J.
Wickmayer Y.[6]
6-47-66
Snigur D.
Minnen G.[3]
6-36-2
Burrage J.[8]
Raina A.
6-06-2
Bulgaru M.
Oz I.
7-56-3
Masarova R.[4]
Noha Akugue N.
6-46-0
Friedsam A.
Ghioroaie Y.
6-16-1
Bartunkova N.
Yastremska D.
7-56-4
Bondar A.
Soboleva A.
5-76-26-3
Arango E.
Ponchet J.
6-37-64
Tig P.
Matoula M.
6-46-756-3
Korpatsch T.
Jeanjean L.
6-42-66-3
Bogdan A.[5]
Tomova V.
6-46-1
Cristian J.
Naef C.
6-46-4
Makarova E.
Baindl K.[7]
6-31-66-1
Lys E.
Cirstea S.[1]
6-36-3