Elena Gabriela Ruse vs Emiliana Arango — Cluj Napoca Quarter-final

Cluj Napoca · WTA · Quarter-final
Elena Gabriela Ruse
ROU
Elena Gabriela Ruse
#72WTA
1850ELO
1754Hard ELO
28 yrs · 172 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 16 October 2023
hard
Emiliana Arango
COL
Emiliana Arango
#96WTA
1624ELO
1576Hard ELO
25 yrs · 172 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWLLL
Ruse E.
6-1 0-6 6-1
Arango E.
Ruse E.
6062
Arango E.
1611

Elena Gabriela Ruse defeated Emiliana Arango 6-1 0-6 6-1 in the Cluj Napoca quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Elena Gabriela Ruse came in ranked #72, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ruse E.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Arango E.

Arango E.serving57% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Ruse E.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Ruse E.Arango E.
0
Serve
0
32
Return
62

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ruse E.Arango E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
58%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
42%
Service points won·Slight edge
58%
53%
Return points won·Even
46%
46%
Break points saved·Even
55%
53%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.2
1.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
4.3
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (161 vs 168). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ruse E.Arango E.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
66
57
Break points saved·Clear edge
72
56
Break points won·Clear edge
98
81
Deciding sets·Dominant
97
70
Tiebreaks·Dominant
5
75

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ruse E.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 161 days (−1.5)
Arango E.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
6.9+178 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.1Hard Elo 1576
7.1Overall Elo 1850
ELO gap
2.9Overall Elo 1624
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.4
Surface form
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
7.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ruse E.Arango E.
Freshness·Slight edge
98
89

Ruse E.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Arango E.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 33 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Korpatsch T.
Ruse E.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Ruse E.
Masarova R.[4]
6-16-4
Korpatsch T.
Lys E.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Lys E.
Makarova E.
6-26-2
Korpatsch T.
Snigur D.
3-66-26-4
Ruse E.
Arango E.
6-10-66-1
Masarova R.[4]
Bogdan A.[5]
3-67-646-3
R16
Lys E.
Cristian J.
2-67-56-2
Makarova E.
Tig P.
6-22-66-3
Snigur D.
Friedsam A.
6-01-66-4
Bogdan A.[5]
Bartunkova N.
4-67-657-5
Masarova R.[4]
Bulgaru M.
3-67-686-0
Arango E.
Teichmann J.
6-36-3
Korpatsch T.
Burrage J.[8]
2-66-27-65
Ruse E.
Bondar A.
7-646-2
R32
Ruse E.
Parks A.[2]
6-21-66-4
Teichmann J.
Wickmayer Y.[6]
6-47-66
Snigur D.
Minnen G.[3]
6-36-2
Burrage J.[8]
Raina A.
6-06-2
Bulgaru M.
Oz I.
7-56-3
Masarova R.[4]
Noha Akugue N.
6-46-0
Friedsam A.
Ghioroaie Y.
6-16-1
Bartunkova N.
Yastremska D.
7-56-4
Bondar A.
Soboleva A.
5-76-26-3
Arango E.
Ponchet J.
6-37-64
Tig P.
Matoula M.
6-46-756-3
Korpatsch T.
Jeanjean L.
6-42-66-3
Bogdan A.[5]
Tomova V.
6-46-1
Cristian J.
Naef C.
6-46-4
Makarova E.
Baindl K.[7]
6-31-66-1
Lys E.
Cirstea S.[1]
6-36-3