Keegan Smith vs Kris Van Wyk — Fairfield CH Qualifying Round 1
Fairfield CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 October 2023
hard
Umpiry Score
Pre-match5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited- Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
4.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited- Extended break: 247 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H5.0
5.0
Surface formWin streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. matchContext
5.0
Defending pts5.0
The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.
Smith K.
662
Van Wyk K.
420
Head to head
No previous meetings on record.
Statistics
Recent form75%1st serve in+22%53%
70%1st serve points won70%
54%2nd serve points won+9%45%
66%Service points won+8%58%
35%Return points won+1%36%
68%Break points saved+12%56%
6.4Aces / match+1.25.2
1.7Double faults / match+4.46.1
Averages from each player's recent completed matches (20 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Draw — qualifying
Q2
Perez A.[12]
Markes C.
6-32-66-4
Kirchheimer S.[3]
Quinn E.[10]
7-647-5
Smith K.
Winter E.
6-46-0
Dostanic S.
Moller E.[5]
6-17-63
Holmgren A.[7]
Zhu E.[2]
7-626-4
Tien L.
Gomez F.[4]
2-66-27-64
Q1
Dostanic S.
Cozbinov A.[9]
7-626-1
Tien L.
Kingsley C.[8]
6-46-4
Smith K.
Van Wyk K.[1]
6-46-2
Gomez F.[4]
Vandecasteele Q.
7-56-2
Zhu E.[2]
Whitehouse M.
6-26-2
Quinn E.[10]
Pannu K.
6-26-756-4
Markes C.
Chidekh C.[6]
6-46-2
Moller E.[5]
Banerjee S.
6-47-5
Holmgren A.[7]
Poljicak M.
6-26-4
Kirchheimer S.[3]
Burnett E.
6-26-2
Winter E.
Ponwith N.[11]
6-26-2
Perez A.[12]
Johns G.
6-27-62