Emilio Nava vs Albert Ramos — Malaga CH Round of 16

Malaga CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Emilio Nava
USA
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1621Hard ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 October 2023
hard
ESP5
Albert Ramos
1558ELO
1520Hard ELO
38 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
Nava E.
6-3 7-6
Ramos A.
Nava E.
6772
Ramos A.
3640

Emilio Nava defeated Albert Ramos 6-3 7-6 in the Malaga CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Emilio Nava came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Emilio Nava closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nava E.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Ramos A.

Ramos A.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Nava E.Ramos A.
40
Serve
—
16
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Nava E.Ramos A.
1st serve in·Even
63%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
64%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.7
2.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 158). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nava E.Ramos A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
52
59
Break points saved·Even
94
95
Break points won·Dominant
17
49
Deciding sets·Slight edge
89
80
Tiebreaks·Even
23
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nava E.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Ramos A.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.2+101 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.8Hard Elo 1520
6.8Overall Elo 1704
ELO gap
3.2Overall Elo 1558
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.2
Surface form
0.6
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.7
Minutes 14d
5.8
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nava E.Ramos A.
Freshness·
100
—

Nava E.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Blanchet U.
Bellucci M.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Blanchet U.
Janvier M.
6-17-64
Bellucci M.
Nava E.
7-646-4
Quarter-finals
Janvier M.
Harris B.
7-656-3
Nava E.
Moro Canas A.
2-66-37-5
Blanchet U.
Cobolli F.
6-36-1
Bellucci M.
Vavassori A.
6-37-5
R16
Cobolli F.
Kuzmanov D.
7-56-4
Nava E.
Ramos A.[5]
6-37-64
Vavassori A.
Martinez P.[8]
7-676-726-2
Bellucci M.
Carreno Busta P.
6-37-60
Moro Canas A.
Galan D.[4]
6-36-4
Harris B.
Bautista Agut R.[1]
7-56-4
Blanchet U.
Lestienne C.[6]
6-16-4
Janvier M.
Tirante T.[7]
6-736-37-63
R32
Vavassori A.
Llamas Ruiz P.
7-646-1
Nava E.
Brancaccio R.
6-46-4
Martinez P.[8]
Paire B.
6-04-2
Cobolli F.
Zapata Miralles B.[3]
6-20-0
Blanchet U.
Nagal S.
6-13-0
Galan D.[4]
Grenier H.
6-37-5
Bellucci M.
Carballes Baena R.[2]
4-66-36-2
Tirante T.[7]
Ivashka I.
6-36-2
Bautista Agut R.[1]
Bailly G.
6-46-3
Harris B.
Gakhov I.
6-36-4
Moro Canas A.
Ymer E.
6-17-63
Ramos A.[5]
Andreev A.
4-66-07-5
Janvier M.
Marterer M.
6-23-66-3
Carreno Busta P.
Cazaux A.
2-66-46-3
Lestienne C.[6]
Bellier A.
6-46-4
Kuzmanov D.
Moutet C.
6-22-67-65