Xiaofei Wang vs Hanwen Li — Shenzhen CH Qualifying Round 1

Shenzhen CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
CHN
Xiaofei Wang
#878ATP
23 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 October 2023
hard
CHN11
Hanwen Li
23 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLWL
Wang X.
6-1 7-5
Li H.
Wang X.
672
Li H.
150

Xiaofei Wang defeated Hanwen Li 6-1 7-5 in the Shenzhen CH qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Xiaofei Wang came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Wang X.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Li H.

Li H.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Wang X.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Wang X.Li H.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
50%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
48%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
35%
37%
Break points saved·Even
56%
52%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.8
5.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.2
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (12 vs 9). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wang X.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Li H.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
2.8
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.6
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Q2
Te R.[9]
Moriya H.[3]
6-767-56-3
Sinclair C.[2]
Huang T.
3-66-46-2
Gerasimov E.[10]
Sun F.[6]
6-36-4
Bai Y.[8]
Haliak M.[5]
4-67-56-1
Cui J.[12]
Wang A.
6-46-2
Li Z.
Wang X.
6-16-4
Mo Y.[6]
Wang A.[10]
4-66-26-3
Li Z.[5]
Yang J.[8]
6-16-3
Huang T.[4]
Ho R.[11]
6-36-2
Trongcharoenchaikul W.[12]
Cui J.[3]
6-43-67-65
Xiao L.[9]
Mu T.[2]
5-76-40-0
Gerasimov E.[1]
Barki J.[7]
7-56-1
Q1
Li Z.
Lock B.[1]
6-13-66-1
Gerasimov E.[10]
Xiao L.
6-46-2
Sun F.[6]
Wang C.
6-26-2
Bai Y.[8]
Zhou Y.
6-43-67-67
Haliak M.[5]
Zeng Y.
6-37-66
Cui J.[12]
Yang J.
6-46-0
Wang A.
Ly N.[4]
6-36-4
Te R.[9]
Chen X.
6-06-4
Moriya H.[3]
Mo Y.
6-747-646-3
Huang T.
Statham J.[7]
3-66-47-5
Sinclair C.[2]
Ho R.
6-36-4
Wang X.
Li H.[11]
6-17-5
Wang A.[10]
Tang J.
6-37-64
Mo Y.[6]
Kalovelonis M.
6-26-2
Yang J.[8]
Zeng Y.
1-66-46-1
Li Z.[5]
Matuszewski P.
6-36-2
Ho R.[11]
Sun Q.
6-16-4
Huang T.[4]
Dong J.
6-06-0
Trongcharoenchaikul W.[12]
Tang S.
3-66-16-2
Cui J.[3]
Inui Y.
6-26-4
Mu T.[2]
Masabayashi T.
6-16-3
Xiao L.[9]
Wang C.
6-27-68
Barki J.[7]
De Cuyper J.
6-36-0