Aidan Mayo vs Patrick Kypson — Fairfield CH Round of 32

Fairfield CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Aidan Mayo
#674ATP
1380ELO
1359Hard ELO
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 October 2023
hard
Patrick Kypson
USA
Patrick Kypson
#112ATP
1641ELO
1611Hard ELO
$260kYTD
$1.1MCAREER
26 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWWL
Mayo A.
3-6 7-6 7-6
Kypson P.
Mayo A.
377772
Kypson P.
663641

Aidan Mayo defeated Patrick Kypson 3-6 7-6 7-6 in the Fairfield CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Patrick Kypson came in ranked #112.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mayo A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Kypson P.

Kypson P.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Mayo A.

Serve advantage — Kypson P.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mayo A.Kypson P.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
53%
Service points won·Even
62%
66%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
65%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.0
7.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.0
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (146 vs 194). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mayo A.Kypson P.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
12
42
Break points saved·Dominant
68
93
Break points won·Dominant
1
41
Deciding sets·Slight edge
8
17
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
52
76

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mayo A.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Kypson P.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
1.8Hard Elo 1359
Surface ELO
8.2+252 Hard Elo edge
1.7Overall Elo 1380
ELO gap
8.3Overall Elo 1641
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
5.5
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
3.1
Minutes 14d
7.8
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mayo A.Kypson P.
Freshness·Even
93
94

Mayo A.: 9 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Kypson P.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Svajda Z.[4]
Basavareddy N.
6-46-1
Semi-finals
Svajda Z.[4]
Ritschard A.[8]
6-36-1
Basavareddy N.
Johnson S.
3-67-56-3
Quarter-finals
Basavareddy N.
Michelsen A.[1]
6-36-3
Ritschard A.[8]
Krueger M.
6-36-3
Svajda Z.[4]
Holt B.
6-46-2
Johnson S.
Harrison C.
6-16-2
R16
Basavareddy N.
Gomez F.
6-01-0
Ritschard A.[8]
Mayo A.
7-56-3
Krueger M.
Tien L.
6-46-3
Michelsen A.[1]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-36-4
Svajda Z.[4]
Mansouri S.
7-50-66-2
Holt B.
Langmo C.
6-35-77-63
Harrison C.
Sandgren T.[7]
5-76-06-3
Johnson S.
Schoolkate T.
7-646-3
R32
Ritschard A.[8]
Smith K.
7-637-64
Tien L.
Moreno De Alboran N.[2]
6-26-796-4
Krueger M.
Perez A.
7-666-2
Mayo A.
Kypson P.
3-67-637-64
Svajda Z.[4]
Dostanic S.
6-35-77-64
Mansouri S.
Pospisil V.
1-66-16-3
Langmo C.
Kirchheimer S.
6-46-4
Holt B.
Galarneau A.[5]
7-696-0
Schoolkate T.
Kudla D.[3]
6-36-4
Gomez F.
Spizzirri E.
3-66-36-3
Sandgren T.[7]
Lajal M.
1-67-646-1
Kwiatkowski T.
Baris O.
6-46-4
Johnson S.
Tomic B.
6-31-66-1
Harrison C.
Holmgren A.
6-46-4
Michelsen A.[1]
Dougaz A.
2-67-656-0
Basavareddy N.
Walton A.[6]
6-37-5