Brandon Holt vs Christian Langmo — Fairfield CH Round of 16

Fairfield CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA
Brandon Holt
#657ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 October 2023
hard
Christian Langmo
USA
Christian Langmo
#467ATP
1267ELO
1254Hard ELO
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWLWLLW
Holt B.
6-3 5-7 7-6
Langmo C.
Holt B.
65772
Langmo C.
37631

Brandon Holt defeated Christian Langmo 6-3 5-7 7-6 in the Fairfield CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Christian Langmo came in ranked #467, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Brandon Holt closed it out in three sets, 6–3 5–7 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Holt B.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Langmo C.

Langmo C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Serve advantage — Holt B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Holt B.Langmo C.
1st serve in·Even
66%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
65%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.8
7.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.0
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (189 vs 156). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Holt B.Langmo C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
58
23
Break points saved·Even
85
88
Break points won·Dominant
31
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
22
Tiebreaks·Dominant
69
39

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Holt B.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Langmo C.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.2+253 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.8Hard Elo 1254
8.4Overall Elo 1537
ELO gap
1.6Overall Elo 1267
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.4
Surface form
3.7
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
7.1
Minutes 14d
7.4
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Holt B.Langmo C.
Freshness·
—
65

Langmo C.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 56 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Svajda Z.[4]
Basavareddy N.
6-46-1
Semi-finals
Svajda Z.[4]
Ritschard A.[8]
6-36-1
Basavareddy N.
Johnson S.
3-67-56-3
Quarter-finals
Basavareddy N.
Michelsen A.[1]
6-36-3
Ritschard A.[8]
Krueger M.
6-36-3
Svajda Z.[4]
Holt B.
6-46-2
Johnson S.
Harrison C.
6-16-2
R16
Basavareddy N.
Gomez F.
6-01-0
Ritschard A.[8]
Mayo A.
7-56-3
Krueger M.
Tien L.
6-46-3
Michelsen A.[1]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-36-4
Svajda Z.[4]
Mansouri S.
7-50-66-2
Holt B.
Langmo C.
6-35-77-63
Harrison C.
Sandgren T.[7]
5-76-06-3
Johnson S.
Schoolkate T.
7-646-3
R32
Ritschard A.[8]
Smith K.
7-637-64
Tien L.
Moreno De Alboran N.[2]
6-26-796-4
Krueger M.
Perez A.
7-666-2
Mayo A.
Kypson P.
3-67-637-64
Svajda Z.[4]
Dostanic S.
6-35-77-64
Mansouri S.
Pospisil V.
1-66-16-3
Langmo C.
Kirchheimer S.
6-46-4
Holt B.
Galarneau A.[5]
7-696-0
Schoolkate T.
Kudla D.[3]
6-36-4
Gomez F.
Spizzirri E.
3-66-36-3
Sandgren T.[7]
Lajal M.
1-67-646-1
Kwiatkowski T.
Baris O.
6-46-4
Johnson S.
Tomic B.
6-31-66-1
Harrison C.
Holmgren A.
6-46-4
Michelsen A.[1]
Dougaz A.
2-67-656-0
Basavareddy N.
Walton A.[6]
6-37-5