Colin Sinclair vs Ray Ho — Shenzhen CH Qualifying Round 1

Shenzhen CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
NMI2
Colin Sinclair
#513ATP
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLWLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 October 2023
hard
TPE
Ray Ho
26 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
Sinclair C.
6-3 6-4
Ho R.
Sinclair C.
662
Ho R.
340

Colin Sinclair defeated Ray Ho 6-3 6-4 in the Shenzhen CH qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sinclair C.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Ho R.

Ho R.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Sinclair C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sinclair C.Ho R.
1st serve in·Even
64%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
60%
Return points won·Even
34%
33%
Break points saved·Even
64%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.5
5.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.9
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (80 vs 29). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sinclair C.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ho R.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.2
Surface form
3.2
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.7
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Q2
Te R.[9]
Moriya H.[3]
6-767-56-3
Sinclair C.[2]
Huang T.
3-66-46-2
Gerasimov E.[10]
Sun F.[6]
6-36-4
Bai Y.[8]
Haliak M.[5]
4-67-56-1
Cui J.[12]
Wang A.
6-46-2
Li Z.
Wang X.
6-16-4
Mo Y.[6]
Wang A.[10]
4-66-26-3
Li Z.[5]
Yang J.[8]
6-16-3
Huang T.[4]
Ho R.[11]
6-36-2
Trongcharoenchaikul W.[12]
Cui J.[3]
6-43-67-65
Xiao L.[9]
Mu T.[2]
5-76-40-0
Gerasimov E.[1]
Barki J.[7]
7-56-1
Q1
Li Z.
Lock B.[1]
6-13-66-1
Gerasimov E.[10]
Xiao L.
6-46-2
Sun F.[6]
Wang C.
6-26-2
Bai Y.[8]
Zhou Y.
6-43-67-67
Haliak M.[5]
Zeng Y.
6-37-66
Cui J.[12]
Yang J.
6-46-0
Wang A.
Ly N.[4]
6-36-4
Te R.[9]
Chen X.
6-06-4
Moriya H.[3]
Mo Y.
6-747-646-3
Huang T.
Statham J.[7]
3-66-47-5
Sinclair C.[2]
Ho R.
6-36-4
Wang X.
Li H.[11]
6-17-5
Wang A.[10]
Tang J.
6-37-64
Mo Y.[6]
Kalovelonis M.
6-26-2
Yang J.[8]
Zeng Y.
1-66-46-1
Li Z.[5]
Matuszewski P.
6-36-2
Ho R.[11]
Sun Q.
6-16-4
Huang T.[4]
Dong J.
6-06-0
Trongcharoenchaikul W.[12]
Tang S.
3-66-16-2
Cui J.[3]
Inui Y.
6-26-4
Mu T.[2]
Masabayashi T.
6-16-3
Xiao L.[9]
Wang C.
6-27-68
Barki J.[7]
De Cuyper J.
6-36-0