Christian Harrison vs Tennys Sandgren — Fairfield CH Round of 16

Fairfield CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA
Christian Harrison
32 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 October 2023
hard
USA7
Tennys Sandgren
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
Harrison C.
5-7 6-0 6-3
Sandgren T.
Harrison C.
5662
Sandgren T.
7031

Christian Harrison defeated Tennys Sandgren 5-7 6-0 6-3 in the Fairfield CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Tennys Sandgren came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Harrison C.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Sandgren T.

Sandgren T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Harrison C.

Serve advantage — Sandgren T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Harrison C.Sandgren T.
1st serve in·Even
63%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
66%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
54%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.9
9.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (33 vs 71). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Harrison C.Sandgren T.
Clutch Rating·Even
34
36
Break points saved·Clear edge
78
92
Break points won·Dominant
33
2
Deciding sets·Clear edge
49
28
Tiebreaks·Dominant
12
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Harrison C.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Sandgren T.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
4.6
Surface form
4.5
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.8
Minutes 14d
8.0
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Svajda Z.[4]
Basavareddy N.
6-46-1
Semi-finals
Svajda Z.[4]
Ritschard A.[8]
6-36-1
Basavareddy N.
Johnson S.
3-67-56-3
Quarter-finals
Basavareddy N.
Michelsen A.[1]
6-36-3
Ritschard A.[8]
Krueger M.
6-36-3
Svajda Z.[4]
Holt B.
6-46-2
Johnson S.
Harrison C.
6-16-2
R16
Basavareddy N.
Gomez F.
6-01-0
Ritschard A.[8]
Mayo A.
7-56-3
Krueger M.
Tien L.
6-46-3
Michelsen A.[1]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-36-4
Svajda Z.[4]
Mansouri S.
7-50-66-2
Holt B.
Langmo C.
6-35-77-63
Harrison C.
Sandgren T.[7]
5-76-06-3
Johnson S.
Schoolkate T.
7-646-3
R32
Ritschard A.[8]
Smith K.
7-637-64
Tien L.
Moreno De Alboran N.[2]
6-26-796-4
Krueger M.
Perez A.
7-666-2
Mayo A.
Kypson P.
3-67-637-64
Svajda Z.[4]
Dostanic S.
6-35-77-64
Mansouri S.
Pospisil V.
1-66-16-3
Langmo C.
Kirchheimer S.
6-46-4
Holt B.
Galarneau A.[5]
7-696-0
Schoolkate T.
Kudla D.[3]
6-36-4
Gomez F.
Spizzirri E.
3-66-36-3
Sandgren T.[7]
Lajal M.
1-67-646-1
Kwiatkowski T.
Baris O.
6-46-4
Johnson S.
Tomic B.
6-31-66-1
Harrison C.
Holmgren A.
6-46-4
Michelsen A.[1]
Dougaz A.
2-67-656-0
Basavareddy N.
Walton A.[6]
6-37-5