Martin Damm vs Viktor Durasovic — Bratislava CH Qualifying Round 1

Bratislava CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
Martin Damm
USA9
Martin Damm
#104ATP
1706ELO
1657Hard ELO
$338kYTD
$910kCAREER
22 yrs · 203 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 October 2023
hard
Viktor Durasovic
NOR
Viktor Durasovic
#474ATP
1320ELO
1329Hard ELO
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWLWL
Damm M.
7-6 6-2
Durasovic V.
Damm M.
7762
Durasovic V.
6420

Martin Damm defeated Viktor Durasovic 7-6 6-2 in the Bratislava CH qualifying round 1 on hard. The result followed the form book — Martin Damm came in ranked #104.

Key context

  • Match story: Martin Damm closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Damm M.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Durasovic V.

Durasovic V.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Damm M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Damm M.Durasovic V.
1st serve in·Even
60%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
79%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
62%
Return points won·Even
33%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
12.6
5.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.5
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (147 vs 151). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Damm M.Durasovic V.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
26
6
Break points saved·Clear edge
93
69
Break points won·Even
1
1
Deciding sets·Slight edge
5
11
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
11

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Damm M.
7.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Durasovic V.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.8+328 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.2Hard Elo 1329
9.2Overall Elo 1706
ELO gap
0.8Overall Elo 1320
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.3
Surface form
2.9
Fatigue & Travel
5.5
Minutes 14d
7.3
7.0
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
6.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Damm M.Durasovic V.
Freshness·Even
97
96

Damm M.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Durasovic V.: 9 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q2
Sachko V.[2]
Karol M.
6-46-1
Marchenko I.[9]
Dutra Da Silva D.[6]
6-47-68
Melzer G.[12]
Stodder T.[5]
7-616-3
Neumayer L.[4]
Kachmazov A.[7]
6-46-2
Safwat M.
Fonio G.[3]
3-66-36-2
Kym J.
Vrbensky M.[8]
6-46-2
Ivanovski K.[10]
Valkusz M.[2]
6-37-5
Gojowczyk P.
Santillan A.
6-26-2
Damm M.[9]
Sousa J.[6]
6-36-746-1
Marchenko I.[5]
Zuk K.[8]
7-57-5
Boitan G.
Ilkel C.[4]
6-26-1
Novak D.[1]
Martineau M.[7]
6-36-3
Q1
Sachko V.[2]
Monzon I.
6-06-1
Dutra Da Silva D.[6]
Pichler D.
2-66-26-2
Safwat M.
Ajdukovic D.[10]
7-612-1
Marchenko I.[9]
Rola B.
4-67-56-3
Melzer G.[12]
Krajci M.
3-66-36-2
Stodder T.[5]
Karlovskiy E.
4-66-26-3
Kachmazov A.[7]
Kopp S.
4-67-667-5
Neumayer L.[4]
Palovic L.
6-47-5
Fonio G.[3]
Leite W.
7-606-1
Karol M.
Blanch U.[11]
4-67-6106-4
Vrbensky M.[8]
Lanik T.
3-66-37-63
Kym J.
Valkusz M.[1]
6-46-4
Marchenko I.[5]
Karlovskiy E.
6-27-68
Boitan G.
Copil M.[12]
3-66-47-65
Martineau M.[7]
Karol M.
6-46-4
Ivanovski K.[10]
Nad P.
6-776-26-0
Ilkel C.[4]
Mrva M.
6-16-4
Novak D.[1]
Borg L.
6-37-64
Zuk K.[8]
Topo M.
7-57-64
Damm M.[9]
Durasovic V.
7-646-2
Sousa J.[6]
Mukund S.
6-34-66-3
Gojowczyk P.
Erel Y.[11]
4-66-16-2
Santillan A.
Molleker R.[3]
6-37-5
Valkusz M.[2]
Krajci M.
6-36-4