Federico Coria vs Juan Pablo Ficovich — Buenos Aires CH Round of 32

Buenos Aires CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Federico Coria
ARG1
Federico Coria
#889ATP
1537ELO
1515Clay ELO
34 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 October 2023
clay
Juan Pablo Ficovich
ARG
Juan Pablo Ficovich
#197ATP
1415ELO
1383Clay ELO
$100kYTD
$984kCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
Coria F.
7-6 2-6 6-3
Ficovich J.
Coria F.
77262
Ficovich J.
64631

Federico Coria defeated Juan Pablo Ficovich 7-6 2-6 6-3 in the Buenos Aires CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Juan Pablo Ficovich came in ranked #197, leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's quarter-final, but Federico Coria had been the form player, winning 1 of their last 4 on clay. Federico Coria claimed a first win over Juan Pablo Ficovich in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Federico Coria closed it out in three sets, 7–6 2–6 6–3.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-01-31CordobaR32clayJuan Pablo Ficovich7-6(5) 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Coria F.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Ficovich J.

Ficovich J.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Coria F.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Coria F.Ficovich J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
63%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
58%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
43%
38%
Break points saved·Even
55%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.4
4.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (188 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Coria F.Ficovich J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
67
16
Break points saved·Slight edge
71
76
Break points won·Dominant
72
9
Deciding sets·Dominant
78
27
Tiebreaks·Dominant
76
5

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Coria F.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Ficovich J.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.7+132 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.3Clay Elo 1383
6.5Overall Elo 1537
ELO gap
3.5Overall Elo 1415
5.4
H2H
4.6
8.0
Surface form
3.5
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
7.3
Minutes 14d
6.8
4.0
3-set count
4.0
6.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
7.0
Opponent rise
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Coria F.Ficovich J.
Freshness·Even
82
80

Coria F.: 3 days rest · 2 matches, 39 games (7d) · Ficovich J.: 4 days rest · 1 match, 33 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Darderi L.[3]
6-36-3
Navone M.
Coria F.[1]
2-66-36-4
Semi-finals
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Navone M.[7]
6-26-3
Darderi L.[3]
Collarini A.[1]
4-67-656-2
Navone M.
Darderi L.
2-66-47-5
Coria F.[1]
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Casanova H.
6-36-2
Darderi L.[3]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-36-2
Collarini A.[1]
Villanueva G.
6-26-1
Navone M.[7]
Burruchaga R.
6-37-62
Darderi L.
Cerundolo J.[2]
6-37-5
Navone M.
Agamenone F.
6-36-2
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
Comesana F.[7]
7-654-67-63
Coria F.[1]
Choinski J.[8]
5-77-636-3
R16
Collarini A.[1]
Comesana F.
6-36-4
Navone M.[7]
Torres J.
7-50-67-5
Casanova H.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-16-726-4
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Aboian V.
6-36-4
Darderi L.[3]
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-26-0
Villanueva G.
Hardt N.[6]
7-51-67-5
Burruchaga R.
Heide G.
6-16-2
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Dellien Velasco M.
6-13-66-1
Choinski J.[8]
Dellien H.
6-40-0
Cerundolo J.[2]
Pellegrino A.
6-24-66-4
Navone M.
Elias G.
3-66-47-63
Agamenone F.
Villanueva G.
7-626-2
Comesana F.[7]
Kovalik J.
6-736-36-4
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
Olivo R.
6-36-4
Coria F.[1]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-16-3
Darderi L.
Kopriva V.[5]
6-34-66-4
R32
Villanueva G.
Lama G.
7-667-62
Aboian V.
Pereira J.
3-66-13-0
Navone M.[7]
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-36-2
Heide G.
Kestelboim M.
6-46-3
Dellien Velasco M.
Leite W.
6-36-2
Comesana F.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-46-2
Hardt N.[6]
Midon L.
6-46-4
Torres J.
Zukas M.
6-26-1
Casanova H.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-16-3
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Barrena A.
6-06-4
Darderi L.[3]
Janvier M.
6-36-4
Collarini A.[1]
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-46-2
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Hassan B.
6-24-66-3
Reis Da Silva J.
Ficovich J.[4]
6-27-5
Burruchaga R.
Farjat T.
6-26-1
Huertas Del Pino C.
Otegui J.
6-46-2
Pellegrino A.
Andreozzi G.
7-56-2
Kopriva V.[5]
Svrcina D.
7-57-63
Cerundolo J.[2]
Collarini A.
6-36-3
Villanueva G.
Torres J.
2-66-26-3
Agamenone F.
Tabilo A.[6]
6-43-67-5
Comesana F.[7]
Trungelliti M.
6-46-3
Kovalik J.
Neumayer L.
6-756-46-2
Olivo R.
Burruchaga R.
6-06-4
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
Delbonis F.
6-36-4
Choinski J.[8]
Monteiro T.
6-31-66-3
Dellien H.
Olivieri G.
5-76-47-65
Coria F.[1]
Ficovich J.
7-642-66-3
Darderi L.
Meligeni Alves F.
4-66-26-4
Elias G.
Barrios Vera T.[4]
4-66-27-5
Navone M.
Dellien Velasco M.
6-26-2
Reis Da Silva J.
Bagnis F.
6-757-57-62