Juan Manuel Cerundolo vs Andrea Pellegrino — Buenos Aires CH Round of 16

Buenos Aires CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
ARG2
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
#45ATP
1790ELO
1762Clay ELO
$752kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
24 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWLWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 October 2023
clay
Andrea Pellegrino
ITA
Andrea Pellegrino
#138ATP
1674ELO
1654Clay ELO
$320kYTD
$1.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWLWWWL
Cerundolo J.
6-2 4-6 6-4
Pellegrino A.
Cerundolo J.
6462
Pellegrino A.
2641

Juan Manuel Cerundolo defeated Andrea Pellegrino 6-2 4-6 6-4 in the Buenos Aires CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Juan Manuel Cerundolo came in ranked #45, defending the title.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cerundolo J.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Pellegrino A.

Pellegrino A.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Cerundolo J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Cerundolo J.Pellegrino A.
15
Serve
—
41
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Cerundolo J.Pellegrino A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
60%
Return points won·Even
41%
40%
Break points saved·Even
56%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.2
2.2
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cerundolo J.Pellegrino A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
85
55
Break points saved·Clear edge
82
67
Break points won·Dominant
80
35
Deciding sets·Clear edge
98
82
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
96
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cerundolo J.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Pellegrino A.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
6.7+108 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.3Clay Elo 1654
6.7Overall Elo 1790
ELO gap
3.3Overall Elo 1674
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
8.3
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.8
Minutes 14d
6.1
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Cerundolo J.Pellegrino A.
Freshness·Clear edge
100
86

Cerundolo J.: 15 days rest · Pellegrino A.: 6 days rest · 2 matches, 47 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Darderi L.[3]
6-36-3
Navone M.
Coria F.[1]
2-66-36-4
Semi-finals
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Navone M.[7]
6-26-3
Darderi L.[3]
Collarini A.[1]
4-67-656-2
Navone M.
Darderi L.
2-66-47-5
Coria F.[1]
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Casanova H.
6-36-2
Darderi L.[3]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-36-2
Collarini A.[1]
Villanueva G.
6-26-1
Navone M.[7]
Burruchaga R.
6-37-62
Darderi L.
Cerundolo J.[2]
6-37-5
Navone M.
Agamenone F.
6-36-2
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
Comesana F.[7]
7-654-67-63
Coria F.[1]
Choinski J.[8]
5-77-636-3
R16
Collarini A.[1]
Comesana F.
6-36-4
Navone M.[7]
Torres J.
7-50-67-5
Casanova H.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-16-726-4
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Aboian V.
6-36-4
Darderi L.[3]
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-26-0
Villanueva G.
Hardt N.[6]
7-51-67-5
Burruchaga R.
Heide G.
6-16-2
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Dellien Velasco M.
6-13-66-1
Choinski J.[8]
Dellien H.
6-40-0
Cerundolo J.[2]
Pellegrino A.
6-24-66-4
Navone M.
Elias G.
3-66-47-63
Agamenone F.
Villanueva G.
7-626-2
Comesana F.[7]
Kovalik J.
6-736-36-4
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
Olivo R.
6-36-4
Coria F.[1]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-16-3
Darderi L.
Kopriva V.[5]
6-34-66-4
R32
Villanueva G.
Lama G.
7-667-62
Aboian V.
Pereira J.
3-66-13-0
Navone M.[7]
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-36-2
Heide G.
Kestelboim M.
6-46-3
Dellien Velasco M.
Leite W.
6-36-2
Comesana F.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-46-2
Hardt N.[6]
Midon L.
6-46-4
Torres J.
Zukas M.
6-26-1
Casanova H.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-16-3
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Barrena A.
6-06-4
Darderi L.[3]
Janvier M.
6-36-4
Collarini A.[1]
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-46-2
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Hassan B.
6-24-66-3
Reis Da Silva J.
Ficovich J.[4]
6-27-5
Burruchaga R.
Farjat T.
6-26-1
Huertas Del Pino C.
Otegui J.
6-46-2
Pellegrino A.
Andreozzi G.
7-56-2
Kopriva V.[5]
Svrcina D.
7-57-63
Cerundolo J.[2]
Collarini A.
6-36-3
Villanueva G.
Torres J.
2-66-26-3
Agamenone F.
Tabilo A.[6]
6-43-67-5
Comesana F.[7]
Trungelliti M.
6-46-3
Kovalik J.
Neumayer L.
6-756-46-2
Olivo R.
Burruchaga R.
6-06-4
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
Delbonis F.
6-36-4
Choinski J.[8]
Monteiro T.
6-31-66-3
Dellien H.
Olivieri G.
5-76-47-65
Coria F.[1]
Ficovich J.
7-642-66-3
Darderi L.
Meligeni Alves F.
4-66-26-4
Elias G.
Barrios Vera T.[4]
4-66-27-5
Navone M.
Dellien Velasco M.
6-26-2
Reis Da Silva J.
Bagnis F.
6-757-57-62