Luciano Darderi vs Juan Manuel Cerundolo — Buenos Aires CH Quarter-final

Buenos Aires CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Luciano Darderi
ITA
Luciano Darderi
#16ATP
1835ELO
1836Clay ELO
$1.3MYTD
$4.7MCAREER
24 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 October 2023
clay
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
ARG2
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
#42ATP
1790ELO
1762Clay ELO
$752kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
24 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWWWW
Darderi L.
6-3 7-5
Cerundolo J.
Darderi L.
672
Cerundolo J.
350

Luciano Darderi defeated Juan Manuel Cerundolo 6-3 7-5 in the Buenos Aires CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Luciano Darderi came in ranked #16, leading the head-to-head 2–1, defending last year's round of 16. Luciano Darderi extended the head-to-head to 3–1.

Key context

Head to head

2–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-04-22Madrid MastersR64clayLuciano Darderi6-1 6-3
2026-02-16Rio de JaneiroR32clayJuan Manuel Cerundolo6-1 3-6 6-4
2024-02-26SantiagoR16clayLuciano Darderi6-3 3-6 6-3
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Darderi L.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Cerundolo J.

Cerundolo J.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Darderi L.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Darderi L.Cerundolo J.
52
Serve
19
73
Return
49

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Darderi L.Cerundolo J.
1st serve in·Even
58%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.4
3.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Darderi L.Cerundolo J.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
78
85
Break points saved·Clear edge
94
82
Break points won·Dominant
50
80
Deciding sets·Slight edge
93
98
Tiebreaks·Even
94
96

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Darderi L.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Cerundolo J.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
6.4+74 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.6Clay Elo 1762
6.0Overall Elo 1835
ELO gap
4.0Overall Elo 1790
5.4
H2H
4.6
7.2
Surface form
6.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.8
Minutes 14d
8.8
8.0
Prev. match
Context
6.0
Defending pts

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Darderi L.Cerundolo J.
Freshness·Even
97
97

Darderi L.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Cerundolo J.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Darderi L.[3]
6-36-3
Navone M.
Coria F.[1]
2-66-36-4
Semi-finals
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Navone M.[7]
6-26-3
Darderi L.[3]
Collarini A.[1]
4-67-656-2
Navone M.
Darderi L.
2-66-47-5
Coria F.[1]
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Casanova H.
6-36-2
Darderi L.[3]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-36-2
Collarini A.[1]
Villanueva G.
6-26-1
Navone M.[7]
Burruchaga R.
6-37-62
Darderi L.
Cerundolo J.[2]
6-37-5
Navone M.
Agamenone F.
6-36-2
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
Comesana F.[7]
7-654-67-63
Coria F.[1]
Choinski J.[8]
5-77-636-3
R16
Collarini A.[1]
Comesana F.
6-36-4
Navone M.[7]
Torres J.
7-50-67-5
Casanova H.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-16-726-4
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Aboian V.
6-36-4
Darderi L.[3]
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-26-0
Villanueva G.
Hardt N.[6]
7-51-67-5
Burruchaga R.
Heide G.
6-16-2
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Dellien Velasco M.
6-13-66-1
Choinski J.[8]
Dellien H.
6-40-0
Cerundolo J.[2]
Pellegrino A.
6-24-66-4
Navone M.
Elias G.
3-66-47-63
Agamenone F.
Villanueva G.
7-626-2
Comesana F.[7]
Kovalik J.
6-736-36-4
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
Olivo R.
6-36-4
Coria F.[1]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-16-3
Darderi L.
Kopriva V.[5]
6-34-66-4
R32
Villanueva G.
Lama G.
7-667-62
Aboian V.
Pereira J.
3-66-13-0
Navone M.[7]
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-36-2
Heide G.
Kestelboim M.
6-46-3
Dellien Velasco M.
Leite W.
6-36-2
Comesana F.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-46-2
Hardt N.[6]
Midon L.
6-46-4
Torres J.
Zukas M.
6-26-1
Casanova H.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-16-3
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Barrena A.
6-06-4
Darderi L.[3]
Janvier M.
6-36-4
Collarini A.[1]
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-46-2
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Hassan B.
6-24-66-3
Reis Da Silva J.
Ficovich J.[4]
6-27-5
Burruchaga R.
Farjat T.
6-26-1
Huertas Del Pino C.
Otegui J.
6-46-2
Pellegrino A.
Andreozzi G.
7-56-2
Kopriva V.[5]
Svrcina D.
7-57-63
Cerundolo J.[2]
Collarini A.
6-36-3
Villanueva G.
Torres J.
2-66-26-3
Agamenone F.
Tabilo A.[6]
6-43-67-5
Comesana F.[7]
Trungelliti M.
6-46-3
Kovalik J.
Neumayer L.
6-756-46-2
Olivo R.
Burruchaga R.
6-06-4
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
Delbonis F.
6-36-4
Choinski J.[8]
Monteiro T.
6-31-66-3
Dellien H.
Olivieri G.
5-76-47-65
Coria F.[1]
Ficovich J.
7-642-66-3
Darderi L.
Meligeni Alves F.
4-66-26-4
Elias G.
Barrios Vera T.[4]
4-66-27-5
Navone M.
Dellien Velasco M.
6-26-2
Reis Da Silva J.
Bagnis F.
6-757-57-62