Nuno Borges vs Yu Hsiou Hsu — Shenzhen CH Quarter-final

Shenzhen CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Nuno Borges
POR3
Nuno Borges
#52ATP
1769ELO
1714Hard ELO
$811kYTD
$5.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 October 2023
hard
Yu Hsiou Hsu
TPE8
Yu Hsiou Hsu
#210ATP
1489ELO
1468Hard ELO
27 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLW
Borges N.
7-6 6-0
Hsu Y.
Borges N.
7762
Hsu Y.
6000

Nuno Borges defeated Yu Hsiou Hsu 7-6 6-0 in the Shenzhen CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Nuno Borges came in ranked #52.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Borges N.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Hsu Y.

Hsu Y.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Borges N.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Borges N.Hsu Y.
36
Serve
—
16
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Borges N.Hsu Y.
1st serve in·Even
64%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.5
3.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.4
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 169). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Borges N.Hsu Y.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
77
36
Break points saved·Clear edge
98
74
Break points won·Dominant
54
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
96
50
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
70
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Borges N.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Hsu Y.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.5+246 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.5Hard Elo 1468
7.6Overall Elo 1769
ELO gap
2.4Overall Elo 1489
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
6.9
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.8
Minutes 14d
4.4
7.0
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Borges N.Hsu Y.
Freshness·
96
—

Borges N.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Kovacevic A.[6]
Borges N.[3]
7-647-65
Duckworth J.[1]
Wong C.
6-06-1
Semi-finals
Kovacevic A.[6]
Cachin P.[2]
6-47-67
Borges N.[3]
Gerasimov E.
6-26-1
Wong C.
Kovacevic A.[2]
W/O
Duckworth J.[1]
Yunchaokete B.[4]
6-16-2
Quarter-finals
Cachin P.[2]
Jung J.
6-36-4
Kovacevic A.[6]
Yevseyev D.
6-26-4
Gerasimov E.
Zhukayev B.
6-746-26-3
Borges N.[3]
Hsu Y.[8]
7-606-0
Kovacevic A.[2]
Giustino L.
6-33-66-3
Wong C.
Huang T.
4-67-56-3
Yunchaokete B.[4]
Bai Y.
6-36-2
Duckworth J.[1]
Tu L.[5]
6-16-1
R16
Cachin P.[2]
Wu T.
7-656-737-66
Yevseyev D.
Cui J.
6-46-0
Zhukayev B.
Kokkinakis T.[1]
6-36-4
Kovacevic A.[6]
Kachmazov A.
6-16-4
Gerasimov E.
Atmane T.[7]
7-646-3
Borges N.[3]
Yunchaokete B.
6-36-4
Jung J.
Duckworth J.[5]
3-67-56-2
Hsu Y.[8]
Tseng C.
6-36-4
Huang T.
Gerasimov E.
6-36-2
Duckworth J.[1]
Li Z.
7-646-4
Kovacevic A.[2]
Zhukayev B.
6-46-716-0
Giustino L.
Sinclair C.
6-36-4
Tu L.[5]
Palan D.
6-33-66-2
Wong C.
Atmane T.[3]
3-66-37-5
Bai Y.
Diez S.[8]
3-66-16-4
Yunchaokete B.[4]
Kachmazov A.
6-36-4
R32
Yunchaokete B.
Mccabe J.
3-66-32-0
Kokkinakis T.[1]
Sinclair C.
6-23-66-3
Jung J.
Donskoy E.
6-42-66-4
Borges N.[3]
Diez S.
7-56-2
Cachin P.[2]
Bai Y.
6-46-3
Duckworth J.[5]
Uchida K.
6-07-62
Yevseyev D.
Fognini F.[4]
6-47-66
Kachmazov A.
Tang S.
6-36-4
Kovacevic A.[6]
Sekulic P.
6-16-4
Hsu Y.[8]
Te R.
6-26-1
Tseng C.
Saville L.
6-27-5
Atmane T.[7]
Giustino L.
7-646-3
Gerasimov E.
Tu L.
4-66-46-4
Zhukayev B.
Li Z.
6-46-4
Cui J.
Sun Q.
6-36-3
Wu T.
Palan D.
6-47-64
Kovacevic A.[2]
Chen C.
6-36-1
Kachmazov A.
Sun F.
6-37-67
Diez S.[8]
Ly N.
6-46-1
Wong C.
Xiao L.
6-37-64
Zhukayev B.
Wang X.
6-36-4
Giustino L.
Te R.
6-46-3
Atmane T.[3]
Haliak M.
6-16-4
Huang T.
Lock B.
7-56-4
Gerasimov E.
Yevseyev D.[7]
6-26-2
Bai Y.
Weber A.
6-46-727-63
Tu L.[5]
Statham J.
7-56-3
Palan D.
Mo Y.
6-36-3
Li Z.
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
6-37-60
Duckworth J.[1]
Takahashi Y.
6-36-2
Yunchaokete B.[4]
Saville L.
6-36-3
Sinclair C.
Donskoy E.[6]
2-66-36-4