Gabi Adrian Boitan vs Marius Copil — Bratislava CH Qualifying Round 1

Bratislava CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
ROU
Gabi Adrian Boitan
1370ELO
1345Hard ELO
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 October 2023
hard
ROU12
Marius Copil
35 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
Boitan G.
3-6 6-4 7-6
Copil M.
Boitan G.
36772
Copil M.
64651

Gabi Adrian Boitan defeated Marius Copil 3-6 6-4 7-6 in the Bratislava CH qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Boitan G.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Copil M.

Copil M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Boitan G.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Boitan G.Copil M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
76%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
66%
Return points won·Even
39%
35%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.3
8.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.1
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (93 vs 65). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Boitan G.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Copil M.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
6.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q2
Sachko V.[2]
Karol M.
6-46-1
Marchenko I.[9]
Dutra Da Silva D.[6]
6-47-68
Melzer G.[12]
Stodder T.[5]
7-616-3
Neumayer L.[4]
Kachmazov A.[7]
6-46-2
Safwat M.
Fonio G.[3]
3-66-36-2
Kym J.
Vrbensky M.[8]
6-46-2
Ivanovski K.[10]
Valkusz M.[2]
6-37-5
Gojowczyk P.
Santillan A.
6-26-2
Damm M.[9]
Sousa J.[6]
6-36-746-1
Marchenko I.[5]
Zuk K.[8]
7-57-5
Boitan G.
Ilkel C.[4]
6-26-1
Novak D.[1]
Martineau M.[7]
6-36-3
Q1
Sachko V.[2]
Monzon I.
6-06-1
Dutra Da Silva D.[6]
Pichler D.
2-66-26-2
Safwat M.
Ajdukovic D.[10]
7-612-1
Marchenko I.[9]
Rola B.
4-67-56-3
Melzer G.[12]
Krajci M.
3-66-36-2
Stodder T.[5]
Karlovskiy E.
4-66-26-3
Kachmazov A.[7]
Kopp S.
4-67-667-5
Neumayer L.[4]
Palovic L.
6-47-5
Fonio G.[3]
Leite W.
7-606-1
Karol M.
Blanch U.[11]
4-67-6106-4
Vrbensky M.[8]
Lanik T.
3-66-37-63
Kym J.
Valkusz M.[1]
6-46-4
Marchenko I.[5]
Karlovskiy E.
6-27-68
Boitan G.
Copil M.[12]
3-66-47-65
Martineau M.[7]
Karol M.
6-46-4
Ivanovski K.[10]
Nad P.
6-776-26-0
Ilkel C.[4]
Mrva M.
6-16-4
Novak D.[1]
Borg L.
6-37-64
Zuk K.[8]
Topo M.
7-57-64
Damm M.[9]
Durasovic V.
7-646-2
Sousa J.[6]
Mukund S.
6-34-66-3
Gojowczyk P.
Erel Y.[11]
4-66-16-2
Santillan A.
Molleker R.[3]
6-37-5
Valkusz M.[2]
Krajci M.
6-36-4