Emina Bektas vs Su Jeong Jang — Seoul Round of 16

Seoul · WTA · Round of 16
USA
Emina Bektas
#579WTA
1510ELO
1482Hard ELO
33 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 October 2023
hard
KOR
Su Jeong Jang
#657WTA
1384ELO
1355Hard ELO
31 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLLWW
Bektas E.
6-3 6-4
Jang S.
Bektas E.
662
Jang S.
340

Emina Bektas defeated Su Jeong Jang 6-3 6-4 in the Seoul round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Emina Bektas closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bektas E.serving82% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Jang S.

Jang S.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Bektas E.

Serve advantage — Bektas E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bektas E.Jang S.
1st serve in·Even
66%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
44%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
55%
Return points won·Even
39%
43%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
53%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.6
2.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (98 vs 68). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bektas E.Jang S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
44
13
Break points saved·Dominant
82
35
Break points won·Dominant
35
76
Deciding sets·Dominant
71
14
Tiebreaks·
44
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bektas E.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 112 days (−1.5)
Jang S.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
6.6+127 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.4Hard Elo 1355
6.6Overall Elo 1510
ELO gap
3.4Overall Elo 1384
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
3.3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
7.0
7.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Pegula J.[1]
Yuan Y.
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Pegula J.[1]
Wickmayer Y.
6-46-3
Yuan Y.
Bektas E.
6-736-46-2
Quarter-finals
Yuan Y.
Bouzkova M.[4]
7-57-67
Wickmayer Y.
Kudermetova P.
6-36-1
Bektas E.
Birrell K.
4-66-36-2
Pegula J.[1]
Liu C.
4-66-36-0
R16
Yuan Y.
Juvan K.
6-44-1
Liu C.
Rus A.[7]
1-66-33-0
Bouzkova M.[4]
Lys E.
6-1
Bektas E.
Jang S.
6-36-4
Pegula J.[1]
Krueger A.
6-36-1
Birrell K.
Back D.
6-06-1
Kudermetova P.
Von Deichmann K.
6-36-1
Wickmayer Y.
Alexandrova E.[3]
6-37-66
R32
Von Deichmann K.
Khromacheva I.
5-76-43-0
Bektas E.
Pigossi L.
6-756-47-5
Birrell K.
Vickery S.
6-46-4
Kudermetova P.
Parks A.[6]
3-66-16-0
Krueger A.
Podoroska N.
6-26-4
Wickmayer Y.
Liang E.
6-36-4
Lys E.
Schmiedlova A.
6-26-4
Pegula J.[1]
Hruncakova V.
6-26-4
Liu C.
Ku Y.
6-36-3
Rus A.[7]
Han N.
6-16-3
Yuan Y.
Hartono A.
6-16-2
Bouzkova M.[4]
Day K.
6-46-4
Alexandrova E.[3]
Hontama M.
6-36-1
Back D.
Ostapenko J.[2]
3-66-17-64
Juvan K.
Boulter K.[8]
6-46-4
Jang S.
Kenin S.[5]
6-16-4