Mariano Navone vs Franco Agamenone — Buenos Aires CH Quarter-final

Buenos Aires CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Mariano Navone
ARG
Mariano Navone
#38ATP
1822ELO
1800Clay ELO
$722kYTD
$3.1MCAREER
25 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 October 2023
clay
Franco Agamenone
ITA
Franco Agamenone
#268ATP
1454ELO
1434Clay ELO
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWLWWL
Navone M.
6-3 6-2
Agamenone F.
Navone M.
662
Agamenone F.
320

Mariano Navone defeated Franco Agamenone 6-3 6-2 in the Buenos Aires CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Mariano Navone came in ranked #38, defending last year's final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Navone M.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Agamenone F.

Agamenone F.serving54% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Navone M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Navone M.Agamenone F.
0
Serve
—
95
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Navone M.Agamenone F.
1st serve in·Even
67%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Even
59%
58%
Return points won·Even
43%
41%
Break points saved·Even
56%
59%
Aces / match·Even
1.7
2.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 169). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Navone M.Agamenone F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
75
41
Break points saved·Dominant
86
59
Break points won·Dominant
90
51
Deciding sets·Dominant
77
43
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
60
70

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Navone M.
7.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Agamenone F.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.0+366 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.0Clay Elo 1434
8.9Overall Elo 1822
ELO gap
1.1Overall Elo 1454
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.3
Surface form
5.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
3.6
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Navone M.Agamenone F.
Freshness·Slight edge
94
89

Navone M.: 11 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Agamenone F.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 31 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Darderi L.[3]
6-36-3
Navone M.
Coria F.[1]
2-66-36-4
Semi-finals
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Navone M.[7]
6-26-3
Darderi L.[3]
Collarini A.[1]
4-67-656-2
Navone M.
Darderi L.
2-66-47-5
Coria F.[1]
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Casanova H.
6-36-2
Darderi L.[3]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-36-2
Collarini A.[1]
Villanueva G.
6-26-1
Navone M.[7]
Burruchaga R.
6-37-62
Darderi L.
Cerundolo J.[2]
6-37-5
Navone M.
Agamenone F.
6-36-2
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
Comesana F.[7]
7-654-67-63
Coria F.[1]
Choinski J.[8]
5-77-636-3
R16
Collarini A.[1]
Comesana F.
6-36-4
Navone M.[7]
Torres J.
7-50-67-5
Casanova H.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-16-726-4
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Aboian V.
6-36-4
Darderi L.[3]
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-26-0
Villanueva G.
Hardt N.[6]
7-51-67-5
Burruchaga R.
Heide G.
6-16-2
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Dellien Velasco M.
6-13-66-1
Choinski J.[8]
Dellien H.
6-40-0
Cerundolo J.[2]
Pellegrino A.
6-24-66-4
Navone M.
Elias G.
3-66-47-63
Agamenone F.
Villanueva G.
7-626-2
Comesana F.[7]
Kovalik J.
6-736-36-4
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
Olivo R.
6-36-4
Coria F.[1]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-16-3
Darderi L.
Kopriva V.[5]
6-34-66-4
R32
Villanueva G.
Lama G.
7-667-62
Aboian V.
Pereira J.
3-66-13-0
Navone M.[7]
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-36-2
Heide G.
Kestelboim M.
6-46-3
Dellien Velasco M.
Leite W.
6-36-2
Comesana F.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-46-2
Hardt N.[6]
Midon L.
6-46-4
Torres J.
Zukas M.
6-26-1
Casanova H.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-16-3
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Barrena A.
6-06-4
Darderi L.[3]
Janvier M.
6-36-4
Collarini A.[1]
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-46-2
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Hassan B.
6-24-66-3
Reis Da Silva J.
Ficovich J.[4]
6-27-5
Burruchaga R.
Farjat T.
6-26-1
Huertas Del Pino C.
Otegui J.
6-46-2
Pellegrino A.
Andreozzi G.
7-56-2
Kopriva V.[5]
Svrcina D.
7-57-63
Cerundolo J.[2]
Collarini A.
6-36-3
Villanueva G.
Torres J.
2-66-26-3
Agamenone F.
Tabilo A.[6]
6-43-67-5
Comesana F.[7]
Trungelliti M.
6-46-3
Kovalik J.
Neumayer L.
6-756-46-2
Olivo R.
Burruchaga R.
6-06-4
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
Delbonis F.
6-36-4
Choinski J.[8]
Monteiro T.
6-31-66-3
Dellien H.
Olivieri G.
5-76-47-65
Coria F.[1]
Ficovich J.
7-642-66-3
Darderi L.
Meligeni Alves F.
4-66-26-4
Elias G.
Barrios Vera T.[4]
4-66-27-5
Navone M.
Dellien Velasco M.
6-26-2
Reis Da Silva J.
Bagnis F.
6-757-57-62