Federico Coria vs Facundo Diaz Acosta — Buenos Aires CH Semi-final

Buenos Aires CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Federico Coria
ARG1
Federico Coria
#889ATP
1537ELO
1515Clay ELO
34 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 October 2023
clay
Facundo Diaz Acosta
ARG3
Facundo Diaz Acosta
#120ATP
1681ELO
1668Clay ELO
$264kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWWL
Coria F.
6-4 6-4
Diaz Acosta F.
Coria F.
662
Diaz Acosta F.
440

Federico Coria defeated Facundo Diaz Acosta 6-4 6-4 in the Buenos Aires CH semi-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Facundo Diaz Acosta came in ranked #120, leading the head-to-head 3–0, defending last year's final. Federico Coria claimed a first win over Facundo Diaz Acosta in four meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 3–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Federico Coria edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

0–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-07-22KitzbuhelR32clayFacundo Diaz Acosta2-6 6-3 6-0
2024-02-12Buenos AiresSFclayFacundo Diaz Acosta6-2 6-3
2023-02-13Buenos AiresR32clayFacundo Diaz Acosta7-6(5) 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Coria F.serving59% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Diaz Acosta F.

Diaz Acosta F.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Coria F.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Coria F.Diaz Acosta F.
1st serve in·Even
67%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
63%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
58%
62%
Return points won·Even
43%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
55%
61%
Aces / match·Even
2.4
2.8
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (188 vs 191). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Coria F.Diaz Acosta F.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
67
58
Break points saved·Clear edge
71
89
Break points won·Dominant
72
33
Deciding sets·Slight edge
78
67
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
76
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Coria F.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Diaz Acosta F.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.5Clay Elo 1515
Surface ELO
5.5+153 Clay Elo edge
4.8Overall Elo 1537
ELO gap
5.2Overall Elo 1681
4.6
H2H
5.4
8.0
Surface form
5.3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.3
Minutes 14d
7.2
4.0
3-set count
4.0
6.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
Opponent rise
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Coria F.Diaz Acosta F.
Freshness·Dominant
82
41

Coria F.: 3 days rest · 2 matches, 39 games (7d) · Diaz Acosta F.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 139 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Darderi L.[3]
6-36-3
Navone M.
Coria F.[1]
2-66-36-4
Semi-finals
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Navone M.[7]
6-26-3
Darderi L.[3]
Collarini A.[1]
4-67-656-2
Navone M.
Darderi L.
2-66-47-5
Coria F.[1]
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Casanova H.
6-36-2
Darderi L.[3]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-36-2
Collarini A.[1]
Villanueva G.
6-26-1
Navone M.[7]
Burruchaga R.
6-37-62
Darderi L.
Cerundolo J.[2]
6-37-5
Navone M.
Agamenone F.
6-36-2
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
Comesana F.[7]
7-654-67-63
Coria F.[1]
Choinski J.[8]
5-77-636-3
R16
Collarini A.[1]
Comesana F.
6-36-4
Navone M.[7]
Torres J.
7-50-67-5
Casanova H.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-16-726-4
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Aboian V.
6-36-4
Darderi L.[3]
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-26-0
Villanueva G.
Hardt N.[6]
7-51-67-5
Burruchaga R.
Heide G.
6-16-2
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Dellien Velasco M.
6-13-66-1
Choinski J.[8]
Dellien H.
6-40-0
Cerundolo J.[2]
Pellegrino A.
6-24-66-4
Navone M.
Elias G.
3-66-47-63
Agamenone F.
Villanueva G.
7-626-2
Comesana F.[7]
Kovalik J.
6-736-36-4
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
Olivo R.
6-36-4
Coria F.[1]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-16-3
Darderi L.
Kopriva V.[5]
6-34-66-4
R32
Villanueva G.
Lama G.
7-667-62
Aboian V.
Pereira J.
3-66-13-0
Navone M.[7]
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-36-2
Heide G.
Kestelboim M.
6-46-3
Dellien Velasco M.
Leite W.
6-36-2
Comesana F.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-46-2
Hardt N.[6]
Midon L.
6-46-4
Torres J.
Zukas M.
6-26-1
Casanova H.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-16-3
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Barrena A.
6-06-4
Darderi L.[3]
Janvier M.
6-36-4
Collarini A.[1]
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-46-2
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Hassan B.
6-24-66-3
Reis Da Silva J.
Ficovich J.[4]
6-27-5
Burruchaga R.
Farjat T.
6-26-1
Huertas Del Pino C.
Otegui J.
6-46-2
Pellegrino A.
Andreozzi G.
7-56-2
Kopriva V.[5]
Svrcina D.
7-57-63
Cerundolo J.[2]
Collarini A.
6-36-3
Villanueva G.
Torres J.
2-66-26-3
Agamenone F.
Tabilo A.[6]
6-43-67-5
Comesana F.[7]
Trungelliti M.
6-46-3
Kovalik J.
Neumayer L.
6-756-46-2
Olivo R.
Burruchaga R.
6-06-4
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
Delbonis F.
6-36-4
Choinski J.[8]
Monteiro T.
6-31-66-3
Dellien H.
Olivieri G.
5-76-47-65
Coria F.[1]
Ficovich J.
7-642-66-3
Darderi L.
Meligeni Alves F.
4-66-26-4
Elias G.
Barrios Vera T.[4]
4-66-27-5
Navone M.
Dellien Velasco M.
6-26-2
Reis Da Silva J.
Bagnis F.
6-757-57-62