Facundo Diaz Acosta vs Francisco Comesana — Buenos Aires CH Quarter-final

Buenos Aires CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Facundo Diaz Acosta
ARG3
Facundo Diaz Acosta
#120ATP
1681ELO
1668Clay ELO
$264kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 October 2023
clay
Francisco Comesana
ARG7
Francisco Comesana
#91ATP
1695ELO
1656Clay ELO
$580kYTD
$2.5MCAREER
25 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWLWW
Diaz Acosta F.
7-6 4-6 7-6
Comesana F.
Diaz Acosta F.
774772
Comesana F.
656631

Facundo Diaz Acosta defeated Francisco Comesana 7-6 4-6 7-6 in the Buenos Aires CH quarter-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Francisco Comesana came in ranked #91, defending the title, but Facundo Diaz Acosta had been the form player, winning 8 of their last 9 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Diaz Acosta F.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Comesana F.

Comesana F.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Diaz Acosta F.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Diaz Acosta F.Comesana F.
—
Serve
55
—
Return
17

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Diaz Acosta F.Comesana F.
1st serve in·Even
63%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
41%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.8
5.8
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (191 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Diaz Acosta F.Comesana F.
Clutch Rating·Even
58
56
Break points saved·Even
89
90
Break points won·Even
33
36
Deciding sets·Clear edge
67
79
Tiebreaks·Dominant
81
38

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Diaz Acosta F.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Comesana F.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
4.7+12 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
5.3Clay Elo 1656
4.3Overall Elo 1681
ELO gap
5.7Overall Elo 1695
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
5.3
Surface form
6.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.2
Minutes 14d
8.2
4.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Diaz Acosta F.Comesana F.
Freshness·Dominant
41
87

Diaz Acosta F.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 139 games (7d) · Comesana F.: 9 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Darderi L.[3]
6-36-3
Navone M.
Coria F.[1]
2-66-36-4
Semi-finals
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Navone M.[7]
6-26-3
Darderi L.[3]
Collarini A.[1]
4-67-656-2
Navone M.
Darderi L.
2-66-47-5
Coria F.[1]
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Casanova H.
6-36-2
Darderi L.[3]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-36-2
Collarini A.[1]
Villanueva G.
6-26-1
Navone M.[7]
Burruchaga R.
6-37-62
Darderi L.
Cerundolo J.[2]
6-37-5
Navone M.
Agamenone F.
6-36-2
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
Comesana F.[7]
7-654-67-63
Coria F.[1]
Choinski J.[8]
5-77-636-3
R16
Collarini A.[1]
Comesana F.
6-36-4
Navone M.[7]
Torres J.
7-50-67-5
Casanova H.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-16-726-4
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Aboian V.
6-36-4
Darderi L.[3]
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-26-0
Villanueva G.
Hardt N.[6]
7-51-67-5
Burruchaga R.
Heide G.
6-16-2
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Dellien Velasco M.
6-13-66-1
Choinski J.[8]
Dellien H.
6-40-0
Cerundolo J.[2]
Pellegrino A.
6-24-66-4
Navone M.
Elias G.
3-66-47-63
Agamenone F.
Villanueva G.
7-626-2
Comesana F.[7]
Kovalik J.
6-736-36-4
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
Olivo R.
6-36-4
Coria F.[1]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-16-3
Darderi L.
Kopriva V.[5]
6-34-66-4
R32
Villanueva G.
Lama G.
7-667-62
Aboian V.
Pereira J.
3-66-13-0
Navone M.[7]
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-36-2
Heide G.
Kestelboim M.
6-46-3
Dellien Velasco M.
Leite W.
6-36-2
Comesana F.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-46-2
Hardt N.[6]
Midon L.
6-46-4
Torres J.
Zukas M.
6-26-1
Casanova H.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-16-3
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Barrena A.
6-06-4
Darderi L.[3]
Janvier M.
6-36-4
Collarini A.[1]
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-46-2
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Hassan B.
6-24-66-3
Reis Da Silva J.
Ficovich J.[4]
6-27-5
Burruchaga R.
Farjat T.
6-26-1
Huertas Del Pino C.
Otegui J.
6-46-2
Pellegrino A.
Andreozzi G.
7-56-2
Kopriva V.[5]
Svrcina D.
7-57-63
Cerundolo J.[2]
Collarini A.
6-36-3
Villanueva G.
Torres J.
2-66-26-3
Agamenone F.
Tabilo A.[6]
6-43-67-5
Comesana F.[7]
Trungelliti M.
6-46-3
Kovalik J.
Neumayer L.
6-756-46-2
Olivo R.
Burruchaga R.
6-06-4
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
Delbonis F.
6-36-4
Choinski J.[8]
Monteiro T.
6-31-66-3
Dellien H.
Olivieri G.
5-76-47-65
Coria F.[1]
Ficovich J.
7-642-66-3
Darderi L.
Meligeni Alves F.
4-66-26-4
Elias G.
Barrios Vera T.[4]
4-66-27-5
Navone M.
Dellien Velasco M.
6-26-2
Reis Da Silva J.
Bagnis F.
6-757-57-62