Adam Walton vs Bernard Tomic — Tiburon CH Quarter-final

Tiburon CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Adam Walton
AUS
Adam Walton
#79ATP
1703ELO
1669Hard ELO
$499kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 October 2023
hard
Bernard Tomic
AUS
Bernard Tomic
#206ATP
1475ELO
1441Hard ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
Walton A.
6-4 6-4
Tomic B.
Walton A.
662
Tomic B.
440

Adam Walton defeated Bernard Tomic 6-4 6-4 in the Tiburon CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Adam Walton came in ranked #79.

Key context

  • Match story: Adam Walton edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Walton A.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Tomic B.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Walton A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Walton A.Tomic B.
35
Serve
—
27
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Walton A.Tomic B.
1st serve in·Even
63%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
50%
Service points won·Even
66%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
62%
62%
Aces / match·Even
6.2
5.8
Double faults / match·Even
1.9
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Walton A.Tomic B.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
65
53
Break points saved·Even
95
92
Break points won·Clear edge
20
4
Deciding sets·Clear edge
95
74
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
70
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Walton A.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Tomic B.
4.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
7.0+228 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.0Hard Elo 1441
7.0Overall Elo 1703
ELO gap
3.0Overall Elo 1475
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.4
Surface form
4.9
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
4.6
Minutes 14d
6.7
4.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Walton A.Tomic B.
Freshness·Dominant
54
84

Walton A.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 122 games (7d) · Tomic B.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Svajda Z.[3]
Walton A.
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Svajda Z.[3]
Galarneau A.[5]
6-36-4
Walton A.
Schoolkate T.
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Galarneau A.[5]
Ritschard A.
6-36-767-5
Walton A.
Tomic B.
6-46-4
Schoolkate T.
Kwiatkowski T.
3-66-46-2
Svajda Z.[3]
Basavareddy N.
6-06-2
R16
Basavareddy N.
Sandgren T.[8]
6-23-1
Walton A.
Tien L.
6-26-4
Tomic B.
Lajal M.
7-616-3
Schoolkate T.
Peniston R.[7]
6-36-4
Kwiatkowski T.
Michelsen A.[1]
4-66-46-3
Ritschard A.
Monday J.
6-36-757-62
Galarneau A.[5]
Dougaz A.
7-651-67-5
Svajda Z.[3]
Johnson S.
3-66-36-4
R32
Svajda Z.[3]
Harrison C.
7-667-5
Basavareddy N.
Shelbayh A.
6-04-2
Sandgren T.[8]
Kingsley C.
6-46-4
Tien L.
Johns G.
6-26-4
Lajal M.
Perez A.
6-16-3
Dougaz A.
Poljicak M.
7-636-4
Tomic B.
Kudla D.[4]
6-14-67-612
Ritschard A.
Moreno De Alboran N.[2]
6-27-5
Galarneau A.[5]
Kypson P.
7-656-4
Peniston R.[7]
Krueger M.
7-646-2
Schoolkate T.
Baris O.
6-36-1
Kwiatkowski T.
Mpetshi Perricard G.
7-646-3
Walton A.
Pospisil V.[6]
6-47-65
Monday J.
Lokoli L.
7-636-2
Johnson S.
Dostanic S.
7-633-66-2
Michelsen A.[1]
Schnur B.
6-726-36-4