Constant Lestienne vs Martin Landaluce — Alicante CH Quarter-final

Alicante CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
FRA1
Constant Lestienne
#1261ATP
34 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 October 2023
clay
Martin Landaluce
ESP
Martin Landaluce
1727ELO
1654Clay ELO
$742kYTD
$1.5MCAREER
20 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWWL
Lestienne C.
6-3 7-6
Landaluce M.
Lestienne C.
6772
Landaluce M.
3650

Constant Lestienne defeated Martin Landaluce 6-3 7-6 in the Alicante CH quarter-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Martin Landaluce came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Lestienne C.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Landaluce M.

Landaluce M.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Lestienne C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Lestienne C.Landaluce M.
1st serve in·Even
60%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
62%
Aces / match·Even
4.0
4.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
4.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (152 vs 172). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lestienne C.Landaluce M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
41
59
Break points saved·Slight edge
86
92
Break points won·Clear edge
39
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
26
89
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
70
58

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Lestienne C.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Landaluce M.
4.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
0.7
Surface form
0.7
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.9
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Lestienne C.Landaluce M.
Freshness·
—
100

Landaluce M.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Lestienne C.[1]
Grenier H.
6-7106-26-4
Semi-finals
Grenier H.
Novak D.
4-66-46-3
Lestienne C.[1]
Marterer M.[6]
7-636-4
Quarter-finals
Novak D.
Ymer E.
6-46-2
Grenier H.
Harris B.
6-36-4
Marterer M.[6]
Damm M.
7-57-5
Lestienne C.[1]
Landaluce M.
6-37-65
R16
Ymer E.
Bellucci M.[8]
3-67-656-3
Harris B.
Martinez P.[3]
6-16-2
Marterer M.[6]
Klein L.
6-37-5
Damm M.
Paire B.[4]
6-26-3
Landaluce M.
Cazaux A.[5]
4-66-26-3
Lestienne C.[1]
Nava E.
6-16-1
Novak D.
Ferreira Silva F.
7-57-67
Grenier H.
Echargui M.
6-46-4
R32
Bellucci M.[8]
Santillan A.
6-47-5
Novak D.
Molcan A.[2]
6-16-3
Harris B.
Celikbilek A.
6-26-756-1
Marterer M.[6]
Moro Canas A.
6-46-4
Landaluce M.
Maestrelli F.
6-44-66-4
Ferreira Silva F.
Blanch D.
6-46-3
Ymer E.
Andreev A.
4-66-16-4
Martinez P.[3]
Carreno Busta P.
6-37-5
Grenier H.
Neuchrist M.
6-46-3
Echargui M.
Tirante T.[7]
6-46-4
Damm M.
Barroso Campos A.
6-47-65
Paire B.[4]
Cukierman D.
6-46-1
Nava E.
Barreto Sanchez D.
6-46-3
Lestienne C.[1]
Gaio F.
6-17-5
Klein L.
Cox D.
6-36-2
Cazaux A.[5]
Brancaccio R.
6-26-1