Bernard Tomic vs Mark Lajal — Tiburon CH Round of 16

Tiburon CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Bernard Tomic
AUS
Bernard Tomic
#206ATP
1475ELO
1441Hard ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 October 2023
hard
EST
Mark Lajal
#159ATP
1589ELO
1556Hard ELO
$97kYTD
$654kCAREER
23 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWLW
Tomic B.
7-6 6-3
Lajal M.
Tomic B.
7762
Lajal M.
6130

Bernard Tomic defeated Mark Lajal 7-6 6-3 in the Tiburon CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Bernard Tomic closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tomic B.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Lajal M.

Lajal M.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Serve advantage — Lajal M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tomic B.Lajal M.
1st serve in·Even
60%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Even
5.8
5.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.0
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tomic B.Lajal M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
53
43
Break points saved·Even
92
89
Break points won·Slight edge
4
13
Deciding sets·Dominant
74
42
Tiebreaks·Even
79
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tomic B.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Lajal M.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.2Hard Elo 1441
Surface ELO
5.8+115 Hard Elo edge
4.2Overall Elo 1475
ELO gap
5.8Overall Elo 1589
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
3.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
6.7
Minutes 14d
8.7
7.0
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tomic B.Lajal M.
Freshness·Even
84
88

Tomic B.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d) · Lajal M.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 28 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Svajda Z.[3]
Walton A.
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Svajda Z.[3]
Galarneau A.[5]
6-36-4
Walton A.
Schoolkate T.
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Galarneau A.[5]
Ritschard A.
6-36-767-5
Walton A.
Tomic B.
6-46-4
Schoolkate T.
Kwiatkowski T.
3-66-46-2
Svajda Z.[3]
Basavareddy N.
6-06-2
R16
Basavareddy N.
Sandgren T.[8]
6-23-1
Walton A.
Tien L.
6-26-4
Tomic B.
Lajal M.
7-616-3
Schoolkate T.
Peniston R.[7]
6-36-4
Kwiatkowski T.
Michelsen A.[1]
4-66-46-3
Ritschard A.
Monday J.
6-36-757-62
Galarneau A.[5]
Dougaz A.
7-651-67-5
Svajda Z.[3]
Johnson S.
3-66-36-4
R32
Svajda Z.[3]
Harrison C.
7-667-5
Basavareddy N.
Shelbayh A.
6-04-2
Sandgren T.[8]
Kingsley C.
6-46-4
Tien L.
Johns G.
6-26-4
Lajal M.
Perez A.
6-16-3
Dougaz A.
Poljicak M.
7-636-4
Tomic B.
Kudla D.[4]
6-14-67-612
Ritschard A.
Moreno De Alboran N.[2]
6-27-5
Galarneau A.[5]
Kypson P.
7-656-4
Peniston R.[7]
Krueger M.
7-646-2
Schoolkate T.
Baris O.
6-36-1
Kwiatkowski T.
Mpetshi Perricard G.
7-646-3
Walton A.
Pospisil V.[6]
6-47-65
Monday J.
Lokoli L.
7-636-2
Johnson S.
Dostanic S.
7-633-66-2
Michelsen A.[1]
Schnur B.
6-726-36-4