Albert Ramos vs Henri Laaksonen — Lisbon CH Round of 32

Lisbon CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ESP1
Albert Ramos
1558ELO
1526Clay ELO
38 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 2 October 2023
clay
SUI
Henri Laaksonen
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLW
Ramos A.
6-4 3-6 6-2
Laaksonen H.
Ramos A.
6362
Laaksonen H.
4621

Albert Ramos defeated Henri Laaksonen 6-4 3-6 6-2 in the Lisbon CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Albert Ramos came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Albert Ramos extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Albert Ramos closed it out in three sets, 6–4 3–6 6–2.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-07-22GstaadR32clayAlbert Ramos6-0 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Ramos A.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Laaksonen H.

Laaksonen H.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Ramos A.

Serve advantage — Ramos A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ramos A.Laaksonen H.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Even
60%
58%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.0
3.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.8
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (158 vs 40). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ramos A.Laaksonen H.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
59
51
Break points saved·Slight edge
95
84
Break points won·Dominant
49
20
Deciding sets·Clear edge
80
92
Tiebreaks·Even
22
25

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ramos A.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Laaksonen H.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
4.1
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.1
Minutes 14d
6.0
7.0
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Cobolli F.[2]
Hassan B.
7-57-5
Semi-finals
Cobolli F.[2]
Agamenone F.
6-46-1
Hassan B.
Ramos A.[1]
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Cobolli F.[2]
Hemery C.
6-46-3
Agamenone F.
Bonadio R.
7-657-5
Hassan B.
Roca Batalla O.
7-616-4
Ramos A.[1]
Sousa J.
6-46-2
R16
Ramos A.[1]
Elias G.
7-676-4
Hassan B.
Gakhov I.[5]
7-56-1
Roca Batalla O.
Llamas Ruiz P.[4]
6-47-62
Cobolli F.[2]
Krutykh O.
7-626-3
Hemery C.
Bailly G.
7-56-746-1
Sousa J.
Sousa P.
6-26-3
Agamenone F.
Mikrut L.
7-646-3
Bonadio R.
Lavagno E.
3-66-36-2
R32
Cobolli F.[2]
Dalla Valle E.
6-45-76-0
Lavagno E.
Valkusz M.
3-67-640-0
Hassan B.
Forti F.
3-66-16-3
Agamenone F.
Gigante M.
6-47-64
Bailly G.
Kolar Z.[7]
6-46-3
Sousa P.
Droguet T.[6]
6-46-4
Sousa J.
Rocha H.
6-27-5
Krutykh O.
Campana Lee G.
5-76-26-3
Bonadio R.
Skatov T.[3]
6-46-3
Roca Batalla O.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-36-4
Llamas Ruiz P.[4]
Giannessi A.
6-36-1
Elias G.
Fatic N.
6-26-2
Mikrut L.
Travaglia S.
1-66-27-61
Hemery C.
Weis A.
6-16-3
Ramos A.[1]
Laaksonen H.
6-43-66-2
Gakhov I.[5]
Blancaneaux G.
6-46-2