Bernard Tomic vs Denis Kudla — Tiburon CH Round of 32

Tiburon CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Bernard Tomic
AUS
Bernard Tomic
#206ATP
1475ELO
1441Hard ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 2 October 2023
hard
USA4
Denis Kudla
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
Tomic B.
6-1 4-6 7-6
Kudla D.
Tomic B.
647142
Kudla D.
166121

Bernard Tomic defeated Denis Kudla 6-1 4-6 7-6 in the Tiburon CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Denis Kudla came in defending last year's semi-final. Bernard Tomic extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Bernard Tomic came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 4–6 7–6.

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-01-20Australian OpenQ1hardDenis Kudla7-6(4) 6-3
2019-04-08HoustonR32clayBernard Tomic7-6(8) 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Tomic B.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Kudla D.

Kudla D.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tomic B.Kudla D.
1st serve in·Even
60%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Even
5.7
5.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.0
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 101). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tomic B.Kudla D.
Clutch Rating·Even
53
50
Break points saved·Even
92
90
Break points won·Clear edge
4
19
Deciding sets·Slight edge
74
81
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
30

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tomic B.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Kudla D.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
7.2
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.7
Minutes 14d
2.3
7.0
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
8.5

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tomic B.Kudla D.
Freshness·
84
—

Tomic B.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Svajda Z.[3]
Walton A.
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Svajda Z.[3]
Galarneau A.[5]
6-36-4
Walton A.
Schoolkate T.
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Galarneau A.[5]
Ritschard A.
6-36-767-5
Walton A.
Tomic B.
6-46-4
Schoolkate T.
Kwiatkowski T.
3-66-46-2
Svajda Z.[3]
Basavareddy N.
6-06-2
R16
Basavareddy N.
Sandgren T.[8]
6-23-1
Walton A.
Tien L.
6-26-4
Tomic B.
Lajal M.
7-616-3
Schoolkate T.
Peniston R.[7]
6-36-4
Kwiatkowski T.
Michelsen A.[1]
4-66-46-3
Ritschard A.
Monday J.
6-36-757-62
Galarneau A.[5]
Dougaz A.
7-651-67-5
Svajda Z.[3]
Johnson S.
3-66-36-4
R32
Svajda Z.[3]
Harrison C.
7-667-5
Basavareddy N.
Shelbayh A.
6-04-2
Sandgren T.[8]
Kingsley C.
6-46-4
Tien L.
Johns G.
6-26-4
Lajal M.
Perez A.
6-16-3
Dougaz A.
Poljicak M.
7-636-4
Tomic B.
Kudla D.[4]
6-14-67-612
Ritschard A.
Moreno De Alboran N.[2]
6-27-5
Galarneau A.[5]
Kypson P.
7-656-4
Peniston R.[7]
Krueger M.
7-646-2
Schoolkate T.
Baris O.
6-36-1
Kwiatkowski T.
Mpetshi Perricard G.
7-646-3
Walton A.
Pospisil V.[6]
6-47-65
Monday J.
Lokoli L.
7-636-2
Johnson S.
Dostanic S.
7-633-66-2
Michelsen A.[1]
Schnur B.
6-726-36-4