Tennys Sandgren vs Cannon Kingsley — Tiburon CH Round of 32

Tiburon CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA8
Tennys Sandgren
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 October 2023
hard
USA
Cannon Kingsley
#421ATP
1342ELO
1345Hard ELO
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLWWLW
Sandgren T.
6-4 6-4
Kingsley C.
Sandgren T.
662
Kingsley C.
440

Tennys Sandgren defeated Cannon Kingsley 6-4 6-4 in the Tiburon CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Tennys Sandgren edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sandgren T.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Kingsley C.

Kingsley C.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Sandgren T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sandgren T.Kingsley C.
1st serve in·Even
61%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
76%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Even
65%
64%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
9.0
6.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.3
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (71 vs 94). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sandgren T.Kingsley C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
36
21
Break points saved·Clear edge
92
74
Break points won·Clear edge
2
19
Deciding sets·Even
28
27
Tiebreaks·Dominant
86
20

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sandgren T.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kingsley C.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.8
Surface form
6.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
4.6
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Svajda Z.[3]
Walton A.
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Svajda Z.[3]
Galarneau A.[5]
6-36-4
Walton A.
Schoolkate T.
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Galarneau A.[5]
Ritschard A.
6-36-767-5
Walton A.
Tomic B.
6-46-4
Schoolkate T.
Kwiatkowski T.
3-66-46-2
Svajda Z.[3]
Basavareddy N.
6-06-2
R16
Basavareddy N.
Sandgren T.[8]
6-23-1
Walton A.
Tien L.
6-26-4
Tomic B.
Lajal M.
7-616-3
Schoolkate T.
Peniston R.[7]
6-36-4
Kwiatkowski T.
Michelsen A.[1]
4-66-46-3
Ritschard A.
Monday J.
6-36-757-62
Galarneau A.[5]
Dougaz A.
7-651-67-5
Svajda Z.[3]
Johnson S.
3-66-36-4
R32
Svajda Z.[3]
Harrison C.
7-667-5
Basavareddy N.
Shelbayh A.
6-04-2
Sandgren T.[8]
Kingsley C.
6-46-4
Tien L.
Johns G.
6-26-4
Lajal M.
Perez A.
6-16-3
Dougaz A.
Poljicak M.
7-636-4
Tomic B.
Kudla D.[4]
6-14-67-612
Ritschard A.
Moreno De Alboran N.[2]
6-27-5
Galarneau A.[5]
Kypson P.
7-656-4
Peniston R.[7]
Krueger M.
7-646-2
Schoolkate T.
Baris O.
6-36-1
Kwiatkowski T.
Mpetshi Perricard G.
7-646-3
Walton A.
Pospisil V.[6]
6-47-65
Monday J.
Lokoli L.
7-636-2
Johnson S.
Dostanic S.
7-633-66-2
Michelsen A.[1]
Schnur B.
6-726-36-4