Cannon Kingsley vs Brandon Holt — Tiburon CH Qualifying Round 1

Tiburon CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
USA
Cannon Kingsley
#421ATP
1342ELO
1345Hard ELO
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 2 October 2023
hard
USA1
Brandon Holt
#657ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
Kingsley C.
3-6 6-1 6-3
Holt B.
Kingsley C.
3662
Holt B.
6131

Cannon Kingsley defeated Brandon Holt 3-6 6-1 6-3 in the Tiburon CH qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kingsley C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Holt B.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Kingsley C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kingsley C.Holt B.
1st serve in·Even
63%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.4
4.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.0
1.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (94 vs 189). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kingsley C.Holt B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
21
58
Break points saved·Slight edge
74
85
Break points won·Clear edge
19
31
Deciding sets·Dominant
27
79
Tiebreaks·Dominant
20
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kingsley C.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Holt B.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.0Hard Elo 1345
Surface ELO
7.0+163 Hard Elo edge
2.6Overall Elo 1342
ELO gap
7.4Overall Elo 1537
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
4.7
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
4.6
Minutes 14d
8.1
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Q2
Kingsley C.
Svajda T.
6-34-66-1
Perez A.
Zhu E.[4]
6-46-2
Basavareddy N.
Mayo A.[9]
7-57-5
Kwiatkowski T.
Gomez F.[6]
7-656-1
Johns G.
Cozbinov A.
6-41-66-1
Schnur B.
Mansouri S.[2]
7-627-62
Q1
Johns G.
Kumar O.[3]
6-16-3
Gomez F.[6]
Burnett E.
6-46-736-4
Kingsley C.
Holt B.[1]
3-66-16-3
Kwiatkowski T.
Moller E.[8]
6-36-2
Zhu E.[4]
Ponwith N.
4-66-27-66
Svajda T.
Trotter J.
6-46-1
Mayo A.[9]
Quinn E.
6-46-4
Basavareddy N.
Langmo C.[5]
6-36-4
Perez A.
Kirchheimer S.[7]
6-36-3
Cozbinov A.
Holmgren A.[11]
6-36-4
Mansouri S.[2]
Rivera H.
1-66-36-4
Schnur B.
Chidekh C.[10]
6-36-2