Coco Gauff vs Petra Martic — Beijing Round of 32

Beijing · WTA · Round of 32
Coco Gauff
USA3
Coco Gauff
#7WTA
2071ELO
2035Hard ELO
$2.9MYTD
$33MCAREER
22 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 2 October 2023
hard
CRO
Petra Martic
#686WTA
1673ELO
1633Hard ELO
35 yrs · 181 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWLL
Gauff C.
7-5 5-7 7-6
Martic P.
Gauff C.
75772
Martic P.
57621

Coco Gauff defeated Petra Martic 7-5 5-7 7-6 in the Beijing round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Coco Gauff came in ranked #7, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Coco Gauff extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-02-22AdelaideR16hardCoco Gauff5-7 6-3 6-4
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Gauff C.serving82% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Martic P.

Martic P.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Gauff C.

Serve advantage — Gauff C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Gauff C.Martic P.
25
Serve
—
100
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Gauff C.Martic P.
1st serve in·Even
60%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
46%
Service points won·Even
59%
59%
Return points won·Slight edge
48%
40%
Break points saved·Even
56%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.3
4.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.8
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 111). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gauff C.Martic P.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
99
74
Break points saved·Slight edge
96
85
Break points won·Dominant
100
66
Deciding sets·Clear edge
100
88
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
99
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gauff C.
8.1
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Martic P.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
10.0+402 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.0Hard Elo 1633
10.0Overall Elo 2071
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1673
10.0
H2H
0.0
9.2
Surface form
3.3
9.06-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.1
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gauff C.Martic P.
Freshness·
54
—

Gauff C.: 2 days rest · 3 matches, 85 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Weather
21°COvercast
Wind 7 km/hHumidity 53%

Draw

Final
Swiatek I.[2]
Samsonova L.
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Swiatek I.[2]
Gauff C.[3]
6-26-3
Samsonova L.
Rybakina E.[5]
7-676-3
Quarter-finals
Gauff C.[3]
Sakkari M.[6]
6-26-4
Rybakina E.[5]
Sabalenka A.[1]
7-56-2
Swiatek I.[2]
Garcia C.[9]
6-787-656-1
Samsonova L.
Ostapenko J.[13]
6-36-2
R16
Rybakina E.[5]
Andreeva M.
2-66-46-1
Sabalenka A.[1]
Paolini J.
6-47-64
Ostapenko J.[13]
Pegula J.[4]
6-46-2
Samsonova L.
Kostyuk M.
6-46-747-5
Sakkari M.[6]
Wang X.
6-42-66-3
Gauff C.[3]
Kudermetova V.[16]
7-656-2
Garcia C.[9]
Kalinina A.
6-36-2
Swiatek I.[2]
Linette M.
6-16-1
R32
Pegula J.[4]
Blinkova A.
6-726-26-1
Linette M.
Brady J.
3-1
Ostapenko J.[13]
Noskova L.
W/O
Paolini J.
Yuan Y.
2-66-36-4
Andreeva M.
Pavlyuchenkova A.
6-26-1
Rybakina E.[5]
Maria T.
7-56-0
Samsonova L.
Kvitova P.[12]
6-47-5
Sakkari M.[6]
Fruhvirtova L.
6-46-2
Kudermetova V.[16]
Tsurenko L.
3-66-06-0
Kalinina A.
Saville D.
6-27-65
Garcia C.[9]
Putintseva Y.
6-33-66-3
Swiatek I.[2]
Gracheva V.
6-46-1
Wang X.
Kasatkina D.[11]
6-46-2
Sabalenka A.[1]
Boulter K.
7-57-62
Kostyuk M.
Jabeur O.[7]
7-656-1
Gauff C.[3]
Martic P.
7-55-77-62
R64
Blinkova A.
Vekic D.
6-37-5
Kostyuk M.
Cocciaretto E.
1-66-36-4
Linette M.
Azarenka V.[14]
5-76-16-2
Paolini J.
Haddad Maia B.[15]
3-66-46-4
Tsurenko L.
Zhu L.
6-03-0
Sabalenka A.[1]
Kenin S.
6-16-2
Yuan Y.
Mertens E.
3-66-16-4
Maria T.
Trevisan M.
6-37-62
Martic P.
Cirstea S.
6-22-67-63
Saville D.
Siniakova K.
6-26-2
Gracheva V.
Potapova A.
6-23-66-1
Putintseva Y.
Bouzkova M.
6-27-65
Swiatek I.[2]
Sorribes Tormo S.
6-46-3
Wang X.
Zvonareva V.
6-46-3
Rybakina E.[5]
Zheng Q.
6-16-2
Boulter K.
Frech M.
6-43-66-2
Garcia C.[9]
Baindl K.
6-26-4
Fruhvirtova L.
Rus A.
6-06-3
Brady J.
Stearns P.
6-46-2
Andreeva M.
Krejcikova B.[10]
6-26-2
Noskova L.
Tian F.
6-46-2
Ostapenko J.[13]
Lys E.
2-66-36-2
Kvitova P.[12]
Wang X.
6-767-56-3
Samsonova L.
Parks A.
6-47-64
Jabeur O.[7]
Krueger A.
6-36-4
Kasatkina D.[11]
Sherif M.
1-66-47-68
Gauff C.[3]
Alexandrova E.
7-56-3
Kalinina A.
Vondrousova M.[8]
1-66-46-1