Albert Ramos vs Gastao Elias — Lisbon CH Round of 16

Lisbon CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ESP1
Albert Ramos
1558ELO
1526Clay ELO
38 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 October 2023
clay
Gastao Elias
POR
Gastao Elias
#728ATP
1447ELO
1425Clay ELO
35 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWL
Ramos A.
7-6 6-4
Elias G.
Ramos A.
7962
Elias G.
6740

Albert Ramos defeated Gastao Elias 7-6 6-4 in the Lisbon CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Albert Ramos came in leading the head-to-head 2–0. Albert Ramos extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-02-27Sao PauloR16clayAlbert Ramos6-4 7-6(5)
2014-02-24Sao PauloR32clayAlbert Ramos6-3 3-6 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Ramos A.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Elias G.

Elias G.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Ramos A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ramos A.Elias G.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
55%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
61%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.1
3.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.8
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (158 vs 126). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ramos A.Elias G.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
59
37
Break points saved·Dominant
95
57
Break points won·Dominant
49
24
Deciding sets·Slight edge
80
86
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
22
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ramos A.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Elias G.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.3+101 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.7Clay Elo 1425
6.4Overall Elo 1558
ELO gap
3.6Overall Elo 1447
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
5.1
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.1
Minutes 14d
8.6
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Cobolli F.[2]
Hassan B.
7-57-5
Semi-finals
Cobolli F.[2]
Agamenone F.
6-46-1
Hassan B.
Ramos A.[1]
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Cobolli F.[2]
Hemery C.
6-46-3
Agamenone F.
Bonadio R.
7-657-5
Hassan B.
Roca Batalla O.
7-616-4
Ramos A.[1]
Sousa J.
6-46-2
R16
Ramos A.[1]
Elias G.
7-676-4
Hassan B.
Gakhov I.[5]
7-56-1
Roca Batalla O.
Llamas Ruiz P.[4]
6-47-62
Cobolli F.[2]
Krutykh O.
7-626-3
Hemery C.
Bailly G.
7-56-746-1
Sousa J.
Sousa P.
6-26-3
Agamenone F.
Mikrut L.
7-646-3
Bonadio R.
Lavagno E.
3-66-36-2
R32
Cobolli F.[2]
Dalla Valle E.
6-45-76-0
Lavagno E.
Valkusz M.
3-67-640-0
Hassan B.
Forti F.
3-66-16-3
Agamenone F.
Gigante M.
6-47-64
Bailly G.
Kolar Z.[7]
6-46-3
Sousa P.
Droguet T.[6]
6-46-4
Sousa J.
Rocha H.
6-27-5
Krutykh O.
Campana Lee G.
5-76-26-3
Bonadio R.
Skatov T.[3]
6-46-3
Roca Batalla O.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-36-4
Llamas Ruiz P.[4]
Giannessi A.
6-36-1
Elias G.
Fatic N.
6-26-2
Mikrut L.
Travaglia S.
1-66-27-61
Hemery C.
Weis A.
6-16-3
Ramos A.[1]
Laaksonen H.
6-43-66-2
Gakhov I.[5]
Blancaneaux G.
6-46-2